我来意译一下那个第一篇

zl123cn

唤醒社会........楼主，你太臆想了 意译可不是YY

灌灌茶

原帖由 zl123cn 于 2010-1-13 15:35 发表
唤醒社会........楼主，你太臆想了 意译可不是YY

同学,麻烦你看了以后再发言,毕竟我一个字一个字打出来也挺辛苦的.
我哪里译了"唤醒社会",我不是刚才还否定了K同学的"唤醒社会"吗?

kunkunkenny

晕不是楼主啊，是我自己理解的。没说对啊，既然大家都说不对，就不对喽。

kunkunkenny

我学文学的，在我看来好的评论就是要有独到的见解，要有唤醒社会的作用，嘿嘿可能我联想丰富吧！作者所赞同的不在于你是否是具有专业的眼光（ technical training ）。评论在于有真知卓见。

kunkunkenny

评论本来就是意识形态很强的。像最后一段，作者说的那个人之所以不会再现是因为Journalistic tastes had changed 。最后一句说了现在评论家倾向于用tecnichal training去评论，而在那个时代这种评论方式是被鄙视的。有些本末倒置的意味，现在过于从专业化理论化的视点去进行评论，而忘记了评论的真正作用。

zl123cn

Of all the changes that have taken place in English-language newspapers during the past quarter-century, perhaps the most far-reaching has been the inexorable decline in the scope and seriousness of their arts coverage.
（过去1/4个世纪里，英语报纸最大的变化就是文艺类的报道量，在广度和深度方面的decline）
Not only have many newspapers done away with their book-review sections, but several major papers, including the Chicago Sun-Times and the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, no longer employ full-time classical-music critics.
（变化：许多报纸的书评区取消了，连那些大报，包括芝加哥太阳报、XX明星论坛报也不再雇佣全职的古典音乐批评家）
Even those papers that continue to review fine-arts events are devoting less space to them, （就算是继续评论美术方面的报纸，也只有少得可怜的空间给他们）
while the “think pieces” on cultural subjects that once graced the pages of big-city Sunday papers are becoming a thing of the past.
（为大城市周日版面增色的这些文化“观点纸”已成为过去式。）

Yet a considerable number of the most significant collections of criticism published in the 20th century, including Virgil Thomson’s The Musical Scene (1945), Edwin Denby’s Looking at the Dance (1949), Kenneth Tynan’s Curtains (1961), and Hilton Kramer’s The Age of the Avant-Garde (1973) consisted in large part of newspaper reviews.
（......这些作品构成了20世纪报纸评论的很大一部分。）
To read such books today is to marvel at the fact that their erudite contents were once deemed suitable for publication in general-circulation dailies.
（今天阅读它们会感到惊奇：如此博学精深的内容会被认为适宜于在日报上定期发表。）

We are even farther removed from the discursive newspaper reviews published in England between the turn of the 20th century and the eve of World War II, at a time when newsprint was dirt-cheap and stylish arts criticism was considered an ornament to the publications in which it appeared.
（我们更远离了20世纪之交到二战前那段discursive newspaper reviews 的时期，那时的新闻纸非常便宜，时髦的文艺批评就是报刊上的增光品）
In those far-off days, it was taken for granted that the critics of major papers would write in detail and at length about the events they covered.1
（在那遥远的年代，大报上的批评家要对自己所报道的事件进行详尽的叙述，这被认为是理所当然的。）
Theirs was a serious business, and even those reviewers who wore their learning lightly, like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman, could be trusted to know what they were about.
（他们干的是一项严肃的活儿，即使像萧伯纳、纽曼这样不显摆学问(低调)的评论家，也could be trusted to know what they were about）
These men (for they were all men) believed in journalism as a calling, and were proud to be published in the daily press.
（这些男人，因为他们都是男人，视报纸为calling，也自豪于在日报上发表文章）
“So few authors have brains enough or literary gift enough to keep their own end up in journalism,” Newman wrote, “that I am tempted to define ‘journalism’ as ‘a term of contempt applied by writers who are not read to writers who are.’”
（没有几个作家有足够的头脑和文学天赋使他们在报纸上立足，纽曼写道，我想将journalism定义为一个XXXX的贬义词）

自己翻译一下主要部分，后面省略了。

[ 本帖最后由 zl123cn 于 2010-1-13 16:29 编辑 ]

zl123cn

评论是泛指新闻的所有评论文章了，与消息和通讯文章相对的一种新闻体裁。

critics，这里指的主要就是文艺批评。

也就是说评论是个更大的范围，critics属于评论的一部分。所以前文才有说一堆什么文艺批评构成了当时报纸评论上的很大一块组成部分。

[ 本帖最后由 zl123cn 于 2010-1-13 16:32 编辑 ]

wsdy

在乎的不是翻译 是选项 请问LZ有确切的选项答案吗

aceholding

原帖由 灌灌茶 于 2010-1-13 14:44 发表
记得后面还有内容，就是“因为那个评论家的音乐评论如今不受欢迎”之类的那个意思，看不到原文，翻不了。
根据我对文章的理解（也许是我的意淫），我是选的bcdaa
对那个layout，我没想“排版”啊那么多，因为水平低，不知道有什么排版 ...

强劲支持。后面三个， 6分

aceholding

我21-25 是  DBDAA