考研论坛

 
查看: 27042|回复: 29
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[专业课] 北语英语语言学

[复制链接]

0

主题

25

帖子

114

积分

一般战友

Rank: 2

精华
0
威望
60
K币
54 元
注册时间
2010-10-15
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-11-6 13:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
是内部资料。
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    0

    主题

    25

    帖子

    114

    积分

    一般战友

    Rank: 2

    精华
    0
    威望
    60
    K币
    54 元
    注册时间
    2010-10-15
    沙发
     楼主| 发表于 2010-11-6 13:50 | 只看该作者

    北语英语语言学备考指南

    外国语言学与应用语言学专业备考纲要
    外国语言学与应用语言学分四个科目的考试,其中包括:普通语言学,基础英语,二外,和政治理论。整个复习过程中需要特别注意的是语言学和基础英语,因为这两个科目各占150分,下面专门就普通语言学讲解一下题型及复习技巧。
    语言学的参考书目只有一本,就是北大出版社出版的胡壮麟的《语言学教程》
    第三版,考察的重点是关于语言本体的内容,即前五章导论,语音,词汇,句法,语义的内容,这一部分内容在考试中占到大于三分之二的分数,所以十分重要,后面几章中老师详细讲的只有,第七章社会语言学,第八章语用学,第十一章的语言学与文学,第十二章的流派,其他的不考。所以在复习过程中一定要把重点放在前五章语言主体的部分,概念及例子都要完全理解,要反复的排查自己不理解的地方,及时得寻求解决,否则这可能成为你最后考试中的致命伤,前五章既有概念填空题,又有语料分析题,更有定义和问答题的考察。切记一定要重点掌握,拿下了前五章,你的语言学复习就成功了一大半。后面几章看看老师的讲义还有期末考试的提纲就可以了。先不要急于背诵,首先先把课本从头到尾粗读一遍,了解大概讲了些什么内容,标出自己第一遍看不懂的地方,第二遍细读,就是一个知识点一个知识点得击破,着重理解第一遍没有看懂的地方,用不同的符号标出你对知识点的理解和掌握程度。第二遍结束以后,你已经对语言学的内容有了一个比较详细的了解,但是还没有达到说到一个知识点就能把它的英文定义,以及与它相联系的例子都说出来的水平,这证明你的复习还是远远不够的,到最后所要达到的水平是你对每一章节的内容了如指掌,能够在把书合上的时候,条理清晰得把它的内容表述出来。这样就达到了以不变应万变的效果。
    第一遍和第二遍学习应该在八月份之前完成,当结束完了第二遍学习以后,就不用专门拿出时间来全书翻看了,毕竟考研并不是只考语言学,还有其他科目的学习,而且并不比语言学简单容易多少。相对而言,北语普通语言学考的都是基础的知识,不会考高深的没有学过的东西,所以大家不用太担心,只要把基础打好就完全没有问题,第三轮的复习就可以再复习其他科目的空闲时间把语言学里忘记的或是不会的地方反复去看,反复去记,直到学会记住为止。熟能生巧,少量多次原则在这轮复习里面非常奏效。也许你会觉得自己在这一段时间没有专门拿出时间来看语言学,但是其实你的知识点比以前掌握的更加深入了。不要着急,这个工作一般是在九月份和十月份之间完成,查漏补缺。力求每个知识点都理解到位。
    接下来第四轮就是形成自己的体系,迅速得把书再看一遍,差不多在头脑中形成自己的记忆轮廓,不要急于在这个时候背诵,关键是形成一条线,把知识都串联起来。
    在最后一个月的时候,就可以按照讲义来开始背诵了,这个过程有点痛苦,但是一定要坚持,坚持到底就是希望,可能对于有的同学来说语言学很枯燥,背了忘,忘了又背,没关系,多背几遍自然就可以了。考前一个星期每天都要背。
    下面介绍一下语言学考试的题型。
    1.填空题 :50分 主要是知识点的理解和运用,大部分是语料分析,比如说给几个单词让分析哪部份是粘着词素,哪部份是自由词素。root和stem的区别,以及给出一个句子让分析里面词语的类别,如open class or closed class, functional word or lexical word ,以及划分句子成分的树形图,还有合作原则的各个次则。
    2.填空题:50分  全都是概念,每个空2分,一共25个空,基本上都是课本和讲义上重点讲过的内容,没有太偏的题。当然也不会出讲义上的原话,而是把句法一变,不改变原来的意思,让你填写这个概念,只要理解得到位了,这个完全没有问题。
    3.名词解释:一共有五到六个definition,做这样的题的时候只给出定义就可以了,如果学有余力的同学可以把例子也写上去,这样比较保险。以09年研究生入学考试为例:
    Duality: is meant the property of having two levels of structures, such that units of the primary level are composed of elements of the secondary level and each of the two levels has its own principles of organization .we call sounds secondary units as opposed to primary units as words, since the secondary are meaningless and the primary unit have distinct and identifiable meaning.
    Componential analysis: the meaning of a word is not an unanalysable whole. It may be seen as a complex of different semantic features. There are semantic units smaller than the meaning of a word. i.e. semantic components.
    Paradigmatic relations are relations between a unit and other units that can replace it in a given sequence. Paradigmatically related units form systems.
    Allophone
    Root: the base form of a word that cannot be further analyzed without destroying its meaning.(The part of the word that is left when all the affixed are removed.)
    4.问答题:两个问答题,09年出的题目是:
    1.Leech’s seven types of meaning? 答这个题的时候,要把这七条记清楚,并最好附上例子,例子见后面的讲义。
    1.        G.Leech recognizes 7 types for meaning in his semantics
    1.        Conceptual meaning: logical, cognitive, or denotative content
    2.        Connotative meaning: what is communicated by virtue of what language refers to.
    3.        Social meaning: what is communicated of the social circumstances of language use.
    4.        Affective meaning: what is communicated of the feelings and attitudes of the speaker/writer.
    5.        Reflected meaning: what is communicated through association with another sense of the same expression.
    6.        Collocative meaning: what is communicated through association with words which tend to occur in the environment of another word.
    7.        Thematic meaning: what is communicated by the way in which the message is organized in terms of order and emphasis.
    2.        The difference between subject-predicate analysis and theme-rheme analysis.  此题分别答一下两个的特点就可以了。
         In subject-predicate analysis, the subject is defined by the following properties:
    1.        Word order: subject ordinarily precedes the verb in statement.
    2.        Pro-forms: the first and third person pronouns in English appear in special form when the pronoun is a subject. This form is not used when the pronoun occurs in other position.
    3.        Agreement with the verb: In the simple present tense, an –s is added to the verb when a third person subject is singular.
    4.        Content question: if the subject is replaced by a question word (who/ what), the rest of the sentence remains the unchanged. But when any other element of the sentence is replaced by a question word, an auxiliary verb must appear before the subject.
    5.        Tag question: the pronoun in a tag question normally corresponds to the subject of the sentence.
    In theme-rheme analysis, Theme is the starting point of an utterance and Rheme is the nucleus or the core of the utterance. The analysis of a sentence in terms of theme and rheme is now known as the functional sentence perspective because this patterning is determined by the functional approach of the speaker.
    二外日语,参考书目是新编标准日本语初级上下册,及中级上册,中级上册看旧版的就可以了。因为老师出题不可能从新版上出题。复习过程中一定把每课的单词和语法熟背,反复得背,另外需要注意的一点事课后的翻译题一定要背,而且要准确得背,因为翻译部分都是在这里出题的。09年的题目比较简单,出了初级上下册的题目,没有出中级的题,但是今年一定要三本都复习,以防万一。
    题型:
    1.汉字注假名(10个 有“海,歌,体,旅行,”)
    2.假名写汉字(10个  有“老师,世界,电影,”)
    3.写出外来语的意思(10个)
    4.选择题,选助词
    5.选择题,选实词
    6.翻译   先是中翻日  然后是日翻中
    7.一篇阅读理解,后面五个选择题。
    基础英语,没有参考书目,按照专八的复习就可以了,完全可以应对,而且可以一举两得。推荐的书目有星火英语的标准阅读100篇,还有写作指南及翻译指南。不要用本科用的那种高级英语及综合教程。
    题型
    1.20个单词语法题
    2.5篇阅读理解
    3.一篇中翻英
    4.一篇英翻中
    5.作文
    法语题型
    1.        语法题:单项选择形式
    2.        划线提问
    3.        阅读
    4.        作文 (两个题目,任选一写):题目很简单,09年的两个题目为Ma famille & Ma vie universaire

    评分

    参与人数 1威望 +30 收起 理由
    bati-argentina + 30

    查看全部评分

    回复

    使用道具 举报

    0

    主题

    25

    帖子

    114

    积分

    一般战友

    Rank: 2

    精华
    0
    威望
    60
    K币
    54 元
    注册时间
    2010-10-15
    板凳
     楼主| 发表于 2010-11-6 13:51 | 只看该作者

    王振亚语言学讲义

    Course Description
    Course: Introduction to Linguistics(语言学导论)
    Textbook: Linguistics: A Course Book (2nd Edition)(语言学教程)(the first 5 chapters in this term)
    Instructor: 王振亚 (电话:82303517,82388258)(wangzhenya1969@sina.com
    Grades: class participation (30%) and final exam (70%)

    Chapter 1. Invitation to linguistics
    Natural vs artificial languages
    I. The definition of Language
    Language is a system of arbitrary vocal symbols used for human communication.
    System:rule-governed: str… internationalization, a smart student
    Arbitrary: no logical relationship between language elements and their meaning:
    A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.
    A sound must seem to be an echo to its sense.
    Vocal: speech is primary
    Symbol: related to arbitrariness, language elements are only the symbols for the meaning they express
    Human: uniquely human or human specific or species specific
    Communication: the primary function of language
    II. Design features of language
    The defining properties of language
    Arbitrariness: not entirely arbitrary:
    onomatopoeic words: bark, tick
    compoundings: blackboard, automobile
    derivatives: worker, impossible
    some surnames: Johnson, Longfellow, Black
    Duality: the two subsystems of sound and meaning
    Creativity: language users can understand and produce new sentences to express new meanings.
    Displacement: language can be used to talk about things that are not present
    (structure-dependent operations)
    III. Functions of language
    Functions: broad categories of language uses
    Informative: when language is used to express human experience and knowledge about the world.
    Interpersonal: when language is used to establish and maintain social relations
    Performative: when language is used to perform certain acts
    Emotive: when language is used to change the emotional states of an audience or used to express the speaker’s emotions or attitudes towards something or some person.
    Phatic communion: occurs when language is used for pure interpersonal purposes, e.g. greetings, farewells, etc.
    Recreational: when language is used for the pure joy of using it
    Metalinguistic: when language is used to discuss itself
    IV. The definition of linguistics: The scientific study of language
    V. Main branches of linguistics
    Phonetics: the description, classification and transcription of speech sounds
    Phonology: the study of speech sounds as a system: the relations between speech sounds, the way in which speech sounds are related to meaning, the rules governing the structure, distribution and sequencing of speech sounds
    Morphology: the internal structures of words
    Syntax: the internal structures of sentences
    Semantics: the study of meaning as encoded in language
    Pragmatics: the study of language use, meaning in context
    Macrolinguistics: interdisciplinary
    Psycholinguistics: psychology and linguistics combined, the psychological process in language production, comprehension and acquisition
    Sociolinguistics: sociology and linguistics combined, social functions of language and the social characteristics of language users. language varieties and functions
    Anthropological linguistics: anthropology and linguistics combined: the relationship between language and culture
    Computational linguistics: the use of computers to process or produce human language: machine-translation, information retrieval, expert systems
    VI. Important distinctions in linguistics
    Descriptive vs prescriptive studies
    Describing language as it is used by its native speakers is descriptive.
    Trying to lay down language rules for correct uses of language is prescriptive
    Modern linguistics is descriptive.
    Synchronic vs diachronic studies
    Studying language as it is used at a particular point in time is a synchronic study.
    Studying language as it changes over time is a diachronic study
    Langue vs parole
    Langue (language) is the language system: social, essential, stable
    Parole is the actual use of the language system: individual, accidental, unstable
    Competence vs performance
    Competence is the underlying knowledge about one’s language.
    Performance is the actual use of that knowledge in language use situations.
    Etic vs emic
    Etic studies aim at producing an exhaustive list of a linguistic phenomenon.
    Emic studies aims at knowing the relationships between the entities in that list.
    Syntagmatic vs paradiamatic relations
    Syntagmatic relations are relations between units present in the same sequence or construction. Syntagmatically related elements form structures.
    Paradigmatic relations are relations between a unit and other units that can replace it in a given sequence. Paradigmatically related units form systems.
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    0

    主题

    25

    帖子

    114

    积分

    一般战友

    Rank: 2

    精华
    0
    威望
    60
    K币
    54 元
    注册时间
    2010-10-15
    地板
     楼主| 发表于 2010-11-6 13:52 | 只看该作者

    王振亚语言学讲义2

    Chapter 2 Speech Sounds
    I. The three branches of phonetics
    Articulatory phonetics: the study of sound production
    Acoustic phonetics: the study of sound transmission between interlocutors
    Auditory phonetics: the study of sound perception
    II. Speech organs
    Lungs肺
    trachea (wind pipe)气管
    vocal folds (cords)声带: glottis声门: apart (voiceless: /p/), closed together (voiced: /b/), totally closed (glottal stop: /?/
    tongue tip舌尖
    tongue blade舌叶
    tongue front舌前
    tongue back舌后
    tongue root舌跟
    epiglottis会厌
    hard palate硬颚
    soft palate (velum)软颚
    uvula小舌
    teeth 牙
    teeth ridge (alveolar ridge) 齿龈
    lips (labium)唇
    nose鼻
    larynx喉
    pharynx咽
    vocal tract声道
    III. Segments, divergence, and phonetic transcriptions
    Segments: smallest components of speech: bit -- /b/, /i/, /t/
    Divergence: no one-to-one correspondent between pronunciation and spelling: ou – enough, house, through, though, etc.
    Phonetic transcription: international phonetic alphabet
    IV. Consonants
    Consonants: when there is an obstruction of the air stream in the production of a sound
    1) Manners of articulation:
    Stop 爆破音: oral stop: /g/, nasal stop: /m/
    Fricative摩擦音: /s/, /z/
    (median or central) approximant央通音: /r/, /j/
    Lateral approximant边通音: /l/
    Affricate破擦音: /t∫/
    2) Places of articulation
    Bilabial唇音: /m/
    Labiodental唇齿音: /f/
    Dental齿音: /θ/
    Alveolar齿龈音: /t/
    Post-alveolar后齿龈音: /∫/
    Palatal硬颚音: /j/
    Velar软颚音: /k/
    Glottal声门音: /h/
            Bilabial        Labiodental        dental        alveolar        Palatoalveolar        palatal        velar        glottal
    nasal        m                        n                        ŋ       
    ploasive        p b                         t d                        k ɡ       
    fricative                f v        θ        s z        ∫ ʒ                        h
    affricate                                        t∫ dʒ                       
    Central approximant        (w)                        r                j        w       
    Lateral approximant                                l                               
    3) Voicing
    4) Nasal vs oral
    5) Lateral vs central
    V. Vowels
    Cardinal vowels: the reference points for the description and classification of vowels.
    i                                             u

       e                                          o

           Є                                      ɔ

               a                                  ɑ
    The part of the tongue that is raised: front /i:/, central /ə/, back /α/
    The height of the tongue: high, mid, low; closed /i:/, half closed /e/, half open /ε/, open /a/
    The degree of lip rounding: rounded /u:/, unrounded /i:/
    Monophthong vs diphthong or pure vowels vs glidings: /a/, /au/
    Long vs short vowels or tense vs lax vowels: /i:/, /I/
    Front           central            back
    High         i: (beet)                           u: (boot)
                  I (bit)                           ʊ (put)
                   e (bait)                         o (boat)
    Mid              Є (bet)      ə ə: (worker)     ɔ: (bought)
    ⋀ (but)      ɒ (hot, Br.)
                      æ (bat)                    ɒ (hot, Am.)
    low                 a (buy)                 ɑ: (farm)
    VI. Coarticulation and phonetic transcription
    Coarticulation协同发音: in speech a sound may become more like its neighbouring sound.
    Anticipatory coarticulation逆化协同发音: when a sound is influenced by the following sound, e.g. impossible
    Perseverative coarticulation接续性协同发音: when a sound is influenced by the preceding sound, e.g. play
    Broad and narrow transcriptions 宽式和紧式音标
    Diacritics: showing the minute differences between variations of the same sound, e.g. h for aspirated sounds, ~ for nasalized sounds, 0 for devoiced sounds. Broad transcriptions do not make use of these diacritics, while narrow transcriptions do.
    VII. Phonological analysis/phonemic analysis
    Phonemes音位: distinctive speech sounds
    minimal pairs最小对立体: pairs of words that differ in only one sound
    contrastive distribution对立分布: the two different sounds in a minimal pair are in contrastive distribution
    Allophones音位变体: variants of the same phoneme
    complementary distribution互补分布: those sounds that never occur in the same environment are in complementary distribution
    phonetic similarity语音相似性: allophones of the same phoneme must be phonetically similar
    pattern congruity模式一致性: when assigning a sound to one phoneme rather than another, we must take the sound pattern of the language into consideration
    Phonological processes
    Assimilation同化: when a sound take on some or all the characteristics of a neighbouring sound
    regressive assimilation逆同化: when a sound is influenced by the following sound
    progressive assimilation顺同化: when a sound is influenced by the preceding sound
    Phonological processes: processes in which a sound undergoes a change in certain environments or contexts and we can write phonological rules to represent these changes: e.g.
    Voiced sound → voiceless / voiceless _________
    A voiced sound is transformed into a corresponding voiceless sound when it occurs after a voiceless sound: e.g. play
    → is transformed into; / specifies the environment in which the change occurs; _________ indicates the position of the target sound.
    VIII. Distinctive features
    Distinctive features: a phoneme can be further analysed into a set of features and the distinctive features are phonological; binary; articulatorily and acoustically based features
    IX. Suprasegmental phonology超切分音系学concerned with those aspects of sound features that involve more than single sound segments
    Suprasegmental phonemes超切分音位: stress, pitch, intonation
    Syllables and syllabic structures: typically, a syllable consists of onset (consonant preceding the rhyme) and rhyme which consists of nucleus or peak (vowel or syllabic consonant) and coda (consonant following peak). (((C) (C) (C) V ((((C) (C) (C) (C)
    Stress: degree of force used in the production of a syllable
    word stress: distinctive, e.g. PERfect, perfect; REcord, record
    sentence stress: normally, content words are stressed in sentences, while grammatical words are unstressed, but in principle, sentence stress can fall on any word or syllable
    Pitch: different rates of the vibration of the vocal cords produce what is known in acoustics terms as different frequencies and in articulatory terms as different pithes. Pitch variations are called tones: tone languages and non-tone languages
    Intonation: when pitch, stress and length variations are tied to the sentences rather than to the word, they are collectively known as intonation.
    1) intonation can indicate different sentence types: yes-no interrogatives vs other types of sentences.
    2) intonation can impose different sentence structures on sentences.
    3) intonation can bring different part of the sentence into prominence.
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    0

    主题

    25

    帖子

    114

    积分

    一般战友

    Rank: 2

    精华
    0
    威望
    60
    K币
    54 元
    注册时间
    2010-10-15
    5
     楼主| 发表于 2010-11-6 13:52 | 只看该作者

    3

    Chapter 3 Lexicon
    I. What is word
    Three senses of word
    1)        the physically definable unit: between pauses in speech and between blanks in writing
    but “can’t”, “doesn’t”, “for ever”
    2)        the common factor underlying a set of forms: work, works, worked, working
    but “if”, “and”, “the”, “very”
    3)a grammatical unit: sentence, clause, word group / phrase, word, morpheme
       but “nation”, “fast”
    Identification of word
    1)        stability: the constituent parts of a word have little potential for rearrangement
    Playboy: *boyplay; John loves Mary: Mary loves John
    2)        relative uninterruptibility: new elements and pauses are not to be inserted into a word
    nationalization: *nationinteralization, *nation alization
    (even) John doesn’t love Mary.
    3)        a minimum free form: the minimal unit that can constitute an utterance by itself
    -        Is Jane coming this evening? – Possibly.
    -        What is missing in a sentence such as ‘Dog is barking’? – A.
    Lexeme: basic abstract units of the lexicon on the level of language which may be realized in different grammatical forms such as the lexeme “work” in work, works, worked, working. A lexeme may also be a part of another lexeme, e.g. worker, workbook, workday. Idioms are also considered lexemes, e. g. the works of God: nature. Lexemes are the units which are conventionally listed in dictionaries as separate entries.
    II. Classification of words
    Variable vs invariable words
    Variable words are words which have different grammatical forms.
    Invariable words are words which do not have different grammatical forms.
    Grammatical vs lexical words
    Grammatical words are words which express grammatical meanings, e.g. pronouns, prepositions, conjunctions, etc. function words
    Lexical words are words which have lexical content, e.g. nouns, verbs, etc. content words
    Closed-class vs open-class words
    Closed-class words are words whose membership is fixed or limited, e.g. conjunctions, pronouns, prepositions, etc. But even though prepositions are closed class words, they have been increasing in number slowly.
    Open-class words are words whose membership is infinite or unlimited, e.g. nouns, verbs, etc.
    Word classes: categories of words classified according to their grammatical, semantic, phonological properties or on the basis of formal similarities in terms of inflections and distribution. Nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, pronouns, prepositions, conjunctions, interjections, articles
    New word classes identified
    Particles: the infinitive marker ‘to’ and the negative marker ‘not’ and the subordinate element in phrasal verbs, e.g. ‘at’ in look at and ‘out’ in knock out.
    Auxiliaries: the traditional auxiliary and modal verbs such as ‘do’ and ‘can’
    Pro-forms: There are other pro-forms in English in addition to pronouns.
    pro-adjectives: Your pen is red. So is mine.
    Pro-verbs: He knows English better than I do.
    Pro-adverbs: He runs very fast and so do I.
    pro-locative: Jane’s hiding there, behind the door.
    Determiners: words preceding the head noun and determining the kind of reference the noun phrase has, e.g. the (definite) student, a (indefinite) student, some (partitive) students, all (universal) students.
    Pre-diterminers: all, both, half, double, twice, one-third, etc.
    Central determiners: (articles) the, a, (demonstrative pronouns) this, that, these, those, (indefinite pronouns) every, each, some, any, no, either, neither, (possessive pronouns) my, our, your, his, her, its, their, etc.
    Post-determiners: (cardinal numerals) one, two, etc. (ordinal numerals) first, second, etc. (general ordinals) next, last, past, other, additional, etc. (quantifiers) many, several, much, little, a lot of, a great deal of, etc.
    Determiners follow the order pre-determiner + central determiners + post determiners, e.g. all the students, half a year, etc.
    The members of each subclass are usually exclusive of each other. But ordinal numerals and general ordinals may occur before cardinal numerals, e.g. the first two days, the past three weeks, etc.
    III. Formation of words
    Morpheme and morphology
    Morphemes: minimal units of meaning
    Types of morphemes:
    free morphemes: can stand alone as words, e.g. dog, map, nation
    bound morphemes: have to appear with at least another morpheme, e.g. international, pre cede, etc.
    roots: that part of the word left when all the affixes are removed, e.g. internationalism, antidisestablishmentarianism
    free roots: roots that can be used as words, e.g. hopeful, interpersonal
    bound roots: roots that have to be appear with affixes, e.g. precede, receive, submit, retain, recur
    some roots in English have both free and bound variants, e.g. sleepy, slept; childlike, children; goes, went
    affixes: formative elements that have to be attached to at least another morpheme
    prefixes: paragraph, miniskirt, unemployed, incorrect
    suffixes: national, socialist, physics
    infixes: foot / feet, man / men, in Cambodian /sepolah/ (field), /segepolah/ (fields)
    stems: a morpheme or combination of morphemes to which an affix can be attached, e.g. national, internationalism
    inflectional affixes and derivational affixes
    1)        inflectional affixes are productive across an entire category, e.g. –s to all regular plural count nouns, but derivational affixes are not, e.g. production, connection, *maktion, increastion.
    2)        inflectional affixes often add only a grammatical meaning to the stem, but derivational affixes often change the lexical content, e.g. maps, worker.
    3)        Inflectional affixes do not change the word class of the stem, whereas derivational affixes may or may not change the word class of the stem, maps, smoker, incorrect.
    4)        Inflectional affixes are often conditioned by non-semantic linguistic factors, e.g. John loves Mary. whereas derivational affixes are more often based on simple meaning distinctions, correct vs correctness.
    5)        In English, inflectional affixes are normally suffixes, whereas derivational affixes can be prefixes as well.
    6)        In English inflectional affixes are very small in number, whereas derivational affixes are much larger in number.
    Inflection and word formation
    Inflection: the manifestation of grammatical relationships through the addition of inflectional affixes, such as number, person, finiteness, aspect and case, which do not change the grammatical class of the stems to which they are attached.
    Word formation: the process of word variations signaling lexical relationships. It can be further classified into the compositional type (compounding) and the derivational type (derivation).
    Compound: words that consist of more than one free morpheme or the way to join two or more separate words to produce a single form.
    Compounds can be completely united: playboy, hyphenated: mother-in-law, separated: high frequency.
    There are noun compounds, e.g. daybreak, haircut, verb compounds, e.g. brainwash, lip-read, adjective compounds, e.g. man-eating, heartfelt, prepositional compounds, e.g. into, throughout. Compounds can be classified into endocentric (向心的) and exocentric (离心的) compounds. In endocentric nominal and adjectival compounds, the head is derived from a verb. Nominal: self-control, pain-killer, core-meaning; adjectival: eye-entertaining, bullet-resistant, machine-washable. In exocentric nominal and adjectival compounds, the first word is derived from the verb. Nominal: playboy, scarecrow, breakthrough, get-together; adjectival: take-home, runaway, drive-ins.
    Derivation: showing the relationships between roots and affixes and changing or not changing the word class of the original words, e.g. unconscious, booklet, disobey, lengthen, foolish.
    Phonology and morphology
    1)        morpheme and phoneme
    A single phoneme may represent a morpheme, but they are not identical, e.g. /z/: goes, boys, boy’s, is.
    2) morphemic structure and phonological structure
    Morphemes may also be represented by morphemic structures other than a single phoneme, e.g. love ly (monosyllabic), tobacco (polysyllabic). The syllabic structure of a word and its morphemic structure do not necessarily correspond.
    3) allomorph
    Some morphemes have a single form in all contexts, e.g. dog, cat, etc. other morphemes may have different shapes or phonetic forms, e.g. {z}: maps, dogs, watches, oxen, teeth, criteria, craft; {in}: incorrect, impossible, irregular, illegal.
    4)        morphophonology or morphophonemics: the study of the relationship between phonology and morphonology.
    (1)        phonologically conditioned
    assimilation: maps, dogs, incorrect, impossible
    dissimilation: peregrinus (Latin) → pilgrim, marbre (French) → marble
    (2)        morphologically conditioned
    three requirements:
    a.        All the allomorphs should have common meaning, e.g. maps, dogs, watches.
    b.        All the allomorphs should be in complementary distribution, e.g. maps, dogs, watches.
    c.        Allomorphs that share the common meaning should be in parallel formation, e.g.
    ox → oxen, cow → cows
    IV. lexical changes
    New words (neologisms, coinages) are created in the following ways:
    Invention: Kodak, coke, nylon, fax, etc.
    Compounding: moonwalk, chairperson, etc.
    Derivation: semiconductor, supersonic
    Blending: transfer + resister → transistor, smoke +fog → smog
            tele-printer +exchange → telex, modulator + demodulation → modem
    Fusion ( a special type of blendings): spaddle ← spank(拍)+ paddle(打), riffle ← ripple(波纹)+ ruffle(波纹), rampacious ← rampageous(暴跳的) + rapacious(掠夺的)
    Abbreviation: Clippings. Cutting the final part: advertisement → ad, mathematics → math; cutting the initial part: aeroplane → plane omnibus → bus; cutting both the initial and final parts: influenza → flu, refrigerator → fridge
    Acronym: the initial letters of the words in a phrase or idiom or the name of an organization: EEC ← European Economic Community, CIA ← Central Intelligence Agency, Aids ← acquired immune deficiency syndrome, Radar ← radio detecting and ranging
    Backformation: a shorter word is derived by deleting an imagined affix from a longer form: televise ← television, edit ← editor, diagnose ← diagnosis
    Borrowings: from many different languages, especially Greek (electricity, atom), Latin (tumor, alibi), French (table, pork), Spanish (armada, ranch) etc.
    Loanwords: both form and meaning are borrowed with only a light adaptation, e.g. coupon (French), sputnik (Russian), kung-fu (Chinese), Judo (Japanese).
    Loanblends: part of the form is native and part is borrowed, but the meaning is fully borrowed, e.g. coconut (Spanish), Chinatown (Chinese),
    loan shifts: the meaning is borrowed, but the form is native, e.g. bridge (a card game from Italian), artificial satellite (from Russian)
    loan translation: each morpheme or word is translated from the equivalent morpheme or word in another language, e.g. free verse ← verse libre (Latin), black humour ← humour noir.
    V. Phonological change
    Loss: the disappearance of the sound as a phoneme in the phonological system, e.g. /x/ (the voiceless velar fricative) was lost between the times of Chaucer and Shakespeare: hit → it, niht → night. Sound loss may also occur in utterances at the expense of some unstressed vowels: temperature, postscript, the pen and pencil
    Addition: Sounds may be added to the original sound sequence, e.g. rascal → rapscallion, lier → liaison
    Metathesis: the alternation in the sequence of sounds, e.g. brid → bird, middel → middle, lytel → little.
    Assimilation: the change of a sound as a result of the influence of an adjacent sound (contact or contiguous assimilation), e.g. immobile (n → m), support (b → p). Sometimes assimilation may occur between two sounds that are not too far apart (distant or non-contiguous assimilation), e.g. discussing shortly (s → ∫), confound it (∂ → au).
    VI. Semantic change
    Broadening: to extend or elevate the meaning of a word from its original specific sense to a relatively general one, e.g. offend (to strike against → to create or excite anger), bird (young bird → any kind of bird), companion (a person with whom you share bread → a person who accompanies you), etc.
    Narrowing: the original meaning of a word is narrowed or restricted to a specific sense, e.g. girl (young person of either sex → young woman), deer (beast → a particular kind of animal), queen (wife → wife of a king or a female king), etc.
    Meaning shift: the departure of a word from its original domain as a result of its metaphorical usage, e.g. bead (prayer → prayer bead → small, ball-shaped piece of glass, metal or wood), etc.
    Class shift: conversion: the process in which a word changes from one word class to another, e.g. must (have to → an indispensable item), word (a language unit → to express in words), etc.
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    0

    主题

    25

    帖子

    114

    积分

    一般战友

    Rank: 2

    精华
    0
    威望
    60
    K币
    54 元
    注册时间
    2010-10-15
    6
     楼主| 发表于 2010-11-6 13:53 | 只看该作者

    4

    Chapter 4 Syntax
    1.Grammatical categories
    Categories: grammatical categories: the defining properties of language units like nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverb, etc.
    Number: the grammatical category of nouns, pronouns and verbs in English. There are usually two terms of number: singular and plural, e.g. a book, some books; he, they; He speaks English. They speak English.
    Gender: the grammatical category of nouns and pronouns in English e.g. actor, actress; waiter, waitress; he, she. In English the gender distinction is natural as contrasted with the grammatical gender in many other European languages. There are only a small number of nouns indicating the gender distinction, and the elements indicating it are hardly inflectional.
    Case: the grammatical category of nouns and pronouns. In English pronouns have three cases: nominative (I, he, they), accusative (me, him, them) and genitive (my, his, their), but nouns have only two cases: common (John, boy) and genitive (John’s, boy’s).
    Tense: the grammatical gender of verbs, indicating the time of an event in relation to the moment of speaking, e.g. I am a student. I went to the zoo yesterday. Traditionally: past, present, future, past future. Nowadays: past and present.
    Aspect: the grammatical category of verbs, distinguishing the status of events in relation to the time of another event, e.g. I was reading when he came to see me. When I got to the railway station the train had already left. Progressive or continuous vs perfect.
    Degree: the grammatical category of adjectives and adverbs, distinguishing positive or basic (good, smart), comparative (marking an inequality of two states of affairs relative to a certain characteristic, e.g. better, smarter), and superlative (marking the highest degree of some quantity, e.g. best, smartest) levels. For some there is another level of degree, elative (absolute superlative, marking a very high degree of some property without comparison to some other states of affairs, e.g. The performance was most impressive.
    Concord: agreement: the requirement that the forms of two or more words in a syntactic relationship should agree with each other in terms of some categories, e.g. concord in number, e.g. this boy, these boys; a book, some books, concord in number and person between the noun as the subject and the verb, e.g.
    He speaks English,
    They speak English.
    Government: control over the form of some words by other words in certain syntactic constructions, a relationship in which a word of a certain word class determines the form of other words in terms of a certain category, e.g. the English verbs and prepositions determines or governs the form the pronouns following them, e.g.
    John gave her a book.
    The test is important to me.
    2. Syntactic relations
    2.1. positional relations
    Positional relations, or word order, refer to the sequential arrangement of words in a language. If the words in a sentence fail to occur in a fixed order required by the conventions of the language, the sentence is either ungrammatical or nonsensical. For example,
    The boy kicked the ball.
    *Ball the boy licked the. (ungrammatical)
    *The ball kicked the boy. (nonsensical)
    Positional relations are a manifestation of one aspect of “syntagmatic relations” or “horizontal relations” or “chain relations” at the sentential level. Word order is one of the basic ways to classify the languages in the world:
    Word order: SVO, SOV, VSO, OVS, OSV, and VOS languages. English and Chinese are SVO languages;
    Genetic relatedness: Indo-European languages, Sino-Tibetan languages, Semito-Hamitic languages, etc
    Structural characteristics: isolating, agglutinative, inflectional.
    2.2. Relation of substitutability
    The relation of substitutability refers to classes or sets of words or expressions substitutable for each other grammatically in sentences with the same structure:
    The man smiles.
    boy
    girl
    worker …
    He went there yesterday.
               last week
               the day before
               the day before yesterday …
    the relation of substitutability is a manifestation of one aspect of “paradigmatic relations” or “associative relations” or “vertical relations”.
    2.3. Relation of co-occurrence
    The relation of co-occurrence means that words of different sets of classes may permit, or require, the occurrence of a word of another set or class to form a sentence or a particular type of sentences:
    (preceded by)          NP         (followed by)
    A pretty              girl          smiles.
    The tallest            boy          sings.
    The African           man         cries.

    The relation of co-occurrence partly belongs to syntagmatic relations and partly to paradigmatic relations.
    3. Grammatical constructions and their constituents
    3.1 construction
    Grammatical constructions or constructions or construct: any syntactic construction which is assigned one or more conventional functions in a language, together with whatever is linguistically conventionalized about its contributions to the meaning or use the construction contains.
    On the level of syntax the distinction between external and internal properties is made:
    External properties: the properties of the construction as a whole: anything a speaker knows about the construction that is relevant to the large syntactic contexts in which it occurs.
    Internal properties: the construction’s make-up:
    Mary    ate   an apple.
    Subject + verb + object
    this        edition
    Determiner + noun
    may      come
    auxiliary + verb
    Construction may also be a presentation of a constructional type:
    Subject + verb + object (a constructional type)
    Mary    ate   an apple. (a constructional token)
    It is the construction in this sense that can be analyzed into constituents.
    3.2 Constituent
    Constituent: any linguistic unit, which is part of a larger unit: a morpheme may be a constituent of a word; a word may be a constituent of a word group or phrase; a word group or phrase may be a constituent of a clause; and a clause may be a constituent of a sentence.
    Immediate constituents: if a construction is analyzed into two constituents at a level immediately below that construction, they are the immediate constituents of that construction:
    The boy ate the apple

                             The boy               ate the apple
    the boy                                       ate the apple

    the              boy                            ate          the apple
                                                         the apple

                                                     the             apple
    3.3 Immediate constituent analysis
    This practice is known as immediate constituent analysis or IC analysis. In immediate constituent analysis the constructions and constituents are often label as:
    Word level           phrasal
    N = noun            NP = noun phrase
    A = adjective         AP = adjective phrase
    V = verb             VP = verb phrase
    P = preposition       PP = prepositional phrase
    Det = determiner     S = sentence or clause
    Adv = adverb
    Conj = conjunction







    e.g.
                                 S

                          NP           VP

                     Det       N   V         NP

                                          Det     N

                     The     boy  ate      the    apple
                     

    The  boy  ate  the  apple





    This is know as a tree diagram. Bracketing is also an economic notation representing the constituent structure of a grammatical construction:
    ((The) (boy))((ate) ((the) (apple)))
    3.4. Endocentric and exocentric constructions
    3.4.1. Endocentric constructions
    Endocentric constructions are constructions whose distribution is functionally equivalent to that of one or more of its constituents, i.e. a word or a group of words, which serve as a definable center or head. e.g.
    These two oldest stone bridges

                        head




    will be leaving

           head



    very late

        head


    Usually noun phrases, verb phrases and adjective phrases are endocentric constructions.
    3.4.2. Exocentric constructions
    Exocentric constructions are constructions in which none of the constituents are functionally equivalent to the construction as a whole. That is there is no definable center or head. e.g.
    The boy smiled.
    The mobile phone is on the table.
    He kicked the ball.
    John seemed angry.
    Usually basic sentences, prepositional phrases, verb + object constructions, link verb + complement constructions are exocentric constructions.
    3.5. Coordination and subordination
    3.5.1. Coordination
    In English two or more units of equal syntactic status may be joined together to form a construction. This phenomenon is known as coordination and the construction is a coordinate construction. Each of the syntactically equivalent constituents can stand for the whole construction functionally:
    the lady or the tiger
    go to the library and read a book.
    down the stairs and out the door.
    expensive but beautiful
    Such a construction is usually considered to be doubly headed, since both the conjoined constituents are heads of the construction.
    There is no limite to the number of coordinated constituents in a construction:
    A man, a woman, a boy, a cat and a dog got into the car.
    3.5.2. Subordination
    Subordination refers to the process of linking constituents of different syntactic status, one being dependent upon the other, to form a construction. The subordinate constituents modify the head:
    two dogs
    can drink
    swimming in the lake
    hot beyond endurance
    John believes that the airplane was invented by a German.
    Elizabeth opened her present before John finished his dinner.
    There is no limit to the number of subordinate constituents in a construction:
    John is a teacher who has been working in a university that was constructed in 1880 that witnessed the economic crisis that swept the world …
    3.6. Syntactic function
    Syntactic functions show the relationship between a linguistic form and other parts of the linguistic pattern in which it is used.
    Syntactic functions are expressed in such terms as subject, object, predicate, complement, etc.
    3.6.1. Subject:
    In some languages the subject refers to one of the nouns in the nominative case:
    Pater filium amat. (the father loves the son)
    Patrem filius amat. (the son loves the father)
    But not in all languages the distinction between the nominative and objective cases is formally made.
    In some languages the subject is said to be the doer of an action. e.g.
    Mary slapped John.
    But in John was slapped by Mary. The doer of the action is again Mary, but it is not the subject in this passive sentence. So we need to make the distinction between the grammatical and logical subject. In John was slapped by Mary., John is the grammatical subject and the logical subject is Mary.
    Another traditional definition of the subject is “what the sentence is about”. But this definition does not always work, either:
    Bill is a very crafty fellow.
    Jack is pretty reliable, but Bill I don’t trust.
    As for Bill, I wouldn’t take his promises very seriously.
    In all these three sentences Bill is the topic. But it is the subject only in the first sentence. In the second sentence it is the object of the verb, while in the third it is the object of the preposition.
    subject prominent
    topic prominent
    In English the subject has the characteristics presented below:
    Word order: subjects normally precede verbal groups in statements:
    Sally collects stamps.
    I don’t know him.
    Pro-forms: the first and second person pronouns in English can indicate whether they are the subject in a sentence:
    He told me the story.
    I told him the story.
    Agreement with the verb: in the simple present tense a –s is added to the verb when a singular third person subject occurs in the sentence.
    He speaks English well.
    Content question: when the subject is replaced by a question word, the rest of the sentence remains unchanged. But when other elements in the sentence are replaced by a question word, an auxiliary verb appears before the subject:
    John stole the picture from the museum.
    Who stole the picture from the museum?
    What did John steal from the museum?
    Tag questions: the pronoun in the tag normally corresponds to the subject of the sentence:
    John loves Mary, doesn’t he?
    3.6.2. Predicate
    Predicate refers to a major constituent of the sentence structure in a binary analysis in which all obligatory constituents other than the subject are considered together:
    The boy is running.
    Peter broke the window.
    Jane must be mad.
    As predicate includes constituents such as verb, object, complement, etc. some people think it illogical to use a class-term namely the verb, in grammatical analysis of a functional nature. The word predicator is suggested for the verb or verbs included in a predicate.
    3.6.3. Object
    Object may refer to the receiver or goal of an action and is further analyzed into direct object and indirect object:
    Mother bought a doll.
    Mother gave my sister a doll.
    In some inflecting languages, object is marked by case labels: the accusative case for direct object and the dative case for indirect object.
    In English object may be recognized according to its position in a sentence (after the verb and preposition) and according to case markers (for pronouns).
    Mother gave a doll to my sister.
    John kicked me.
    Modern linguists suggest that object refers to the item that can become the subject when the sentence is transformed into a passive sentence:
    John broke the window.
    The window was broken by John.
    Not all nominal groups that appear after a verb in an active sentence can be changed into the subject in a passive sentence:
    He left last week. *Last week was left by him.
    The match lasted three hours. *Three hours were lasted by the match
    He changed trains at Fengtai, *Trains were changed by him at Fengtai.
    Classes and functions determine each other, but not in a one-to-one relation: a class can perform several functions and a function can be fulfilled by several classes:
    a) The boy was playing.
    He was playing football.
    He came here last month.
    Yesterday he went to the Summer Palace.
    He is a student.
    b) The dog was barking.
      We will stay here.
      One hundred is not a small number.
      To run very fast can be dangerous.
    Seeing is believing.
    4. Phrases, clauses and sentences
    4.1. Phrases
    Phrases are single elements of structure containing more than one word, and lacking the subject-predicate structure typical of clauses. Traditionally they are seen as part of a structural hierarchy, positioned between clause and word. Therefore, a phrase must first be a group of words which form a constituent. Second, a phrase is lower on the grammatical hierarchy than clauses. More precisely, simple clauses may (and usually do) contain phrases, but simple phrases do not (in general) contain clauses:
    the three tallest girls (nominal)
    has been doing (verbal)
    extremely difficult (adjectival)
    to the door (prepositional)
    very fast (adverbial)
    However, some linguists make a distinction between word group and phrase. A word group is an extension of word of a particular class by way of modification with its main features of the class unchanged. Thus we may have nominal groups (the three tallest girls), verbal groups (has been doing), adverbial groups (very fast), adjectival groups (extremely difficult), conjunction groups (immediately after, just as), and prepositional groups (right below, all along), etc. A prepositional phrase remains a phrase which consists of a preposition and a nominal group.
    4.2. Clause
    A constituent with its own subject and predicate, if it is included in a sentence, is a clause. Clauses can be classified into finite and non-finite clauses. Non-finite clauses include the traditional infinitive, participial and gerundial phrases:
    John was reading a book when I visited him.
    It’s great for a man to be free.
    Having finished their task, they came to help us.
    John being away, Mary had to do the work.
    Do you mind my smoking here?
    It’s no use crying over spilt milk.
    The traditional phrases are now regarded as clauses because they have explicit or implicit subjects.
    4.3 Sentences
    Sentence is traditionally regarded as the minimum part of language that expresses a complete thought. Bloomfield defined it as “one not included by virtue of any grammatical constituent in any larger linguistic form. Sentences can be classified along the intersecting dimensions of structure and function:
                                     Sentence
    Traditional
                         Simple                    Non-simple

                                         Complex                Compound

                                            Sentence
    Functional
                        Indicative                           Imperative

          Interrogative            Declarative            jussive         optative

    Yes/No        Wh-     Assertion    Exclamation Inclusive   Exclusive
    Assertion: The park is beautiful.
    Exclamation: How beautiful the park is.
    Inclusive jussive (弱祈使句): Let’s go to London.
    Exclusive jussive: Go to London.
    Optative (祈愿句): Let him go to London.
    Some linguists are interested in the functions of language and label various sentences as: statement, question, command, request, confirmation, etc.
    Based on word classes, Bolinger reports five basic sentence types:
    1. Nominal + intransitive verbal: Mother fell.
    2. Nominal + copula + complement (nominal/adjectival): Mother is young / a nurse.
    3. Nominal + transitive verbal + nominal: Mother loves Dad.
    4. Nominal + transitive verbal + nominal + nominal: Mother fed Dad breakfast.
    5. There + existential + nominal: There is time.
    Quirk, et al. introduces seven sentence types according to the grammatical functions:
    1.        SVC: Mary is kind / a nurse.
    2.        SVA: Mary is here / in the house.
    3.        SV: The child is laughing.
    4.        SVO: Somebody caught the ball.
    5.        SVOC: We have proved him wrong / a fool.
    6.        SVOA: I put the plate on the table.
    7.        SVOO: She gave me expensive presents.
    5. Recursiveness (递归性)
    It means that there is no limit to the number of linguistic elements embedded into other linguistic elements:
    I met a man who had a son whose wife sold cookies that she had baked in her kitchen that was fully equipped with electrical appliances that were manufactured in the new factory ...
    John’s sister’s husband’s uncle’s daughter …
    …the bird on the tree in the garden of that house in Beijing
    Recursiveness is generally regarded as the core of creativity of language.
    5.1. Conjoining
    Conjoining refers to the process where one clause is coordinated or conjoined with another. The sentences made up in this way can be understood as instances of coordination:
    John bought a hat and his wife bought a handbag.
    Give me liberty or give me death.
    5.2. Embedding
    Embedding refers to the process in which one clause is included into a sentence in syntactic subordination:
    I saw that man who had visited you last year. (relative)
    I don’t know whether Professor Li needs this book. (complement)
    If you listen to me, you wouldn’t make mistakes. (adverbial)
    6. Beyond the sentence
    Many contemporary linguists are now exploring the syntactic relation between sentences in text, which leads to the development of text linguistics and discourse analysis.
    6.1 Sentential connection
    The notion of hypotactic(从属的)and paratactic(并列的)relations can also be applied to the study of syntactic relations between sentences.
    Hypotactic (形合连接):
    You can phone the doctor if you like. However, I very much doubt whether he is in.
    We live near the sea. So we enjoy a healthy climate.
    Paratactic (意合连接):
    In Guangzhou it is hot and humid during the summer. In Beijing it is hot and dry.
    He dictated the letter. She wrote it.
    The door was open. He walked in.
    6.2. Cohesion
    Cohesion is a concept to do with discourse or text rather than with sentences. It refers to relations of meaning that exist within the text and defines it as a text. It is achieved by using such grammatical cohesive devices as reference, ellipsis, substitution, conjunction and such lexical cohesive devices as lexical repetition, synonyms, antonyms, collocation:
    He could not open the door. It was locked tight. (reference)
    Why don’t you use a recorder? I don’t have one. (substitution)
    Did she get there at 6? No, she got there earlier (than 6). (ellipsis)
    We live near the sea. So we enjoy a healthy climate. (conjunction)
    Algy met a bear. The bear was bulgy. (lexical repetition)
    He was just wondering which road to take when he was startled by a noise from behind him. It was the noise of trotting horses. … He dismounted and led his horse as quickly as he could along the right-hand road. The sound of the cavalry grew rapidly nearer. …(synonymy)
    He fell asleep. What woke him was a loud crash. (antonymy)
    A little fat man of Bombay was smoking one very hot day. But a bird called Snipe flew away with his pipe, which vexed the fat man of Bombay. (lexical collocation)
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    0

    主题

    25

    帖子

    114

    积分

    一般战友

    Rank: 2

    精华
    0
    威望
    60
    K币
    54 元
    注册时间
    2010-10-15
    7
     楼主| 发表于 2010-11-6 13:54 | 只看该作者

    5

    -Chapter 5 Meaning
    Meanings of ‘meaning’
    Leech’s seven types of meaning:
    Conceptual meaning(central and basic): logical, cognitive, denotative content, e.g. woman: a female human being, book: a number of printed pages bound together with a cover.
    Associative meaning (peripheral):
    Connotative meaning: What is communicated by virtue of what language refers to. Cross-individual differences, e.g. woman: long hair wearing, dress and skirt wearing, having maternal instinct, subject to instinct, prone to shed tears, physically weaker, inconstant, sociable and gregarious, emotional, compassionate, sensitive, tender and gentle, capable of speech, experienced in cookery, hard-working. Cross-cultural differences: individualism: (English) a doctrine claiming that the rights of individuals should be put over and above the rights of society, (Chinese) selfishness; book: (English) containing ideas for people to think about, to discuss, to make comments, (Chinese) containing knowledge for people to learn. There are synonyms differing in connotation: politician and statesman, farmer and peasant
    Social meaning (stylistic meaning): What is communicated of the social circumstances of language use, e.g. torch and flash light, department for rent and flat to let; answer and reply, room and chamber; fire, flame and conflagration, weak, feeble and fragile; domicile, residence, abode and home, steed, horse and nag.
    Affective meaning: what is communicated of the feelings and attitudes of the speaker / writer, e.g. you’re a liar. I hate you for that.
    He had flashes of silence that made his conversation perfectly delightful.
    For she was beautiful – her beauty made
    The bright world dim, and everything beside
    Seemed like the fleeting image of a shade.
    “Generally speaking,” said Miss Murdstone, “I don’t like boys. How d’ye do, boy?” under these encouraging circumstances, I replied that I was very well, and wished that she was the same, with such indifferent grace that Miss Murdstone disposed of me in two words, -- “Wants manner!”
    Reflected meaning: What is communicated through association with another sense of the same expression, e.g. The Comforter and The Holy Ghost, the morning star and the evening star; intercourse, ejaculation, erection and cook.
    Collocative meaning: What is communicated through association with words which tend to occur in the environment of another word, e.g.
    Pretty: girl, woman, flower, garden, colour, village
    Handsome: boy, man, car, vessel, overcoat, airliner, typewriter
    Thematic meaning: what is communicated by the way in which the message is organized in terms of order and emphasis, e.g.
    Mr. Micawber has talent but doesn’t have capital.
    Talent Mr. Micawber has, capital Mr. Micawber has not
    The referential theory: a theory of meaning which relates the meaning of a word to the thing it refers to, or stands for.
    Problems: 1) not every word has a reference, e.g. but, on, the. 2) a word is not related to a particular object in the world, e.g. book does not refer to a particular book. Its name, author, publisher, color, thickness and price do not matter when the word is used. The word refers to something abstract in language users’ mind, which is usually known as concept.
    The semantic triangle (associated with Ogden and Richards):
                      concept

    word   ------------------  thing
    Sense refers to the abstract properties of an entity, while reference refers to concrete entities having these properties. In other words, Leech’s conceptual meaning has two sides: sense and reference. Every word has a sense, but not every word has a reference.
    Sense relations
    Synonymy: sameness relation. But total synonymy is rare. Synonyms may differ in style (Little Tom (bought, purchased) a toy bear.) and in connotation (At first I was poor, then I became needy, later I was underprivileged. Now I’m disadvantaged. I still don’t have a cent to my name, but I sure have a great vocabulary). There are dialectal differences as well, e.g. biscuit(英:饼干,美:软饼), corn(英:谷物,美:玉米), jumper(英:毛衣,美:套衫), truck(英:铁路平板车,美:卡车), store(英:货栈,美:商店)。
    Antonymy: oppositeness relation.
    Gradable antonymy: e.g. big - small, old - young, cold - hot, etc. these synonyms have three features: 1) they are gradable: they differ in terms of degree and can be modified by very and used in comparative and superlative degrees, 2) they are graded against different norms: a very small elephant is much bigger than a very big mouse, 3) usually the term for the higher degree serves as the core term (or unmarked term), long vs short.
    Complementary antonymy: alive - dead, male - female, present - absent, odd - even. The assertion of one means the denial of the other and the denial of one means the assertion of the other. Complementary antonyms have three features, 1) they are similar to contradictory propositions in logic: they cannot be both true or false, e.g. This is a male cat. This is a female cat. In contrast, a pair of gradable antonyms can be compared to contrary propositions in logic: they cannot be both true, even though they can be both false, e.g. The coffee is hot. The coffee is cold. 2) the norm of this type is absolute, e.g. a male creature cannot be male in some situations while a female in other situations. 3) there is no cover term ( the unmarked term) for the two members of a pair.
    Converse antonymy (relational opposites): the reversal of a relationship between two entities, e.g. buy – sell, lend – borrow, parent – child, host – guest, before – after. John borrowed something from Jane means the same as Jane lent something to John.
    Hyponymy: meaning inclusiveness, e.g. furniture (superordinate) – desk, sofa, bed, chair, cupboard, etc. (hyponyms or co-hyponyms)
    color
    green   yellow      red
               scarlet   crimson    vermilion
    living
    plant         animal
          bird     fish   insect      animal
                             human        animal
                                   tiger  wolf  elephant  monkey
    Componential analysis: the meaning of a word is seen as a complex of semantic features or components, e.g.
    boy: HUMAN, YOUNG, MALE;
    girl: HUMAN, YOUNG, FEMALE;
    man: HUMAN, ADULT, MALE;
    woman: HUMAN, ADULT, FEMALE;
    dog: CANINE, ADULT, MALE
    bitch: CANINE, ADULT, FEMALE
    puppy: CANINE, YOUNG
    bull:BOVINE, ADULT, MALE
    cow: BOVINE, ADULT, FEMALE
    calf: BOVINE, YOUNG
    If combined into binary features, then:
    boy: HUMAN, -ADULT, MALE;
    girl: HUMAN, -ADULT, -MALE;
    man: HUMAN, ADULT, MALE;
    woman: HUMAN, ADULT, -MALE.
    Words that involve a relation between two entities can be shown:
    Father: PARENT (x, y) & MALE (x) = x is the parent of y and x is male.
    Mother: PARENT (x, y) & -MALE (x) = x is the parent of y and x is female.
    Son: CHILD (x, y) & MALE (x) = x is the child of y and x is male.
    Daughter: CHILD (x, y) & -MALE (x) = x is the child of y and x is female.
    Verbs can also be analyzed in this way, e.g.
    Take: CAUSE (x, (HAVE (x, y))) = x causes x to have y.
    Give: CAUSE (x, (-HAVE (x, y))) = x causes x not to have y.
    Die: BECOME (x, (-ALIVE (x))) = x becomes dead.
    Kill: CAUSE (x, (BECOME (y, (-ALIVE (y)))) = x causes y to become dead
    Sense relations may be better explained in terms of semantic components. Two words or expressions having the same semantic components will be synonyms, e.g. bachelor and unmarried man: HUMAN, ADULT, MALE, UNMARRIED. Two words having contrasting semantic components will be antonyms, e.g. man and woman, take and give, etc. Hyponyms have all the semantic components of their superordinates, e.g. boy and girl: HUMAN,-ADULT and child: HUMAN,-ADULT.
    Problems with semantic componential analysis:
    1)        Many words are polysemous. Consequently they have different sets of semantic components, e.g. man usually has the semantic component MALE, but it may also apply to both sexes, e.g. Man is mortal.
    2)        Some semantic components are binary, e.g. MALE and FEMALE, ADULT and YOUNG. There is a clear-cut division line between MALE and FEMALE. But there is not such a clear-cut division line between ADULT and YOUNG. The division line between boy and man is fuzzy and that between girl and woman is even fuzzier.
    3)        There may be words whose semantic features are difficult to ascertain. So whether it is possible to analyze all the lexical items in this way remains a question difficult to answer.
    Semantic field theory (lexical field theory) is associated with primarily J. Trier. The following premises are fundamental to the lexical field theory.
    1)        The meaning of an individual word is dependent upon the meaning of the rest of the words of the same lexical or conceptual field, e.g. evaluative words: good, excellent, exceptional, first-rate.
    Military ranks
    The USA                        China
    General of the army(五星上将)   上将
    General(上将)                 中将
    Lieutenant general(中将)         少将
    Major general(少将)            大校
    Brigadier general(准将)          上校
    Colonel(上校)                  中校
    Lieutenant colonel(中校)         少校
    Major(少校)                   上尉
    Captain(上尉)                  中尉
    First lieutenant(中尉)            少尉
    Second lieutenant(少尉)          六级士官
    Chief warrant officer(准尉)       五级士官
    Master sergeant(军士长)         四级士官
    Sergeant first class(上士)         三级士官
    Sergeant(中士)                 二级士官
    Corporal(下士)                 一级士官
    Private first class(一等兵)        上等兵
    Private(二等兵)                列兵
    2)        An individual lexical field is constructed like a mosaic with no gaps; the whole set of all lexical fields of a language reflects a self-contained picture of reality.
    3)        If a single word undergoes a change in meaning, then the structure of the lexical field changes.
    Sentence meaning
    Word meaning and sentence structure come together, e.g.
    The boy chased the dog.
    The dog chased the boy.
    Predicate logic, also known as predicate calculus, studies the internal structure of simple propositions.
    Proposition: what is expressed by a sentence which makes a statement. In predicate logic, a proposition has two parts: predicate and argument. For example,
    John is a man. Predicate: man; argument: John. (one-place predicate)
    John loves Mary: predicate: love; arguments: John, Mary. (two-place predicate)
    John gave Mary a book. Predicate: give; arguments: John, Mary, book. (three-place predicate)
    It rains. Predicate: rain. (zero-place predicate)
    A sentence may contain several propositions, e.g.
    John’ s friend Tony, who is a dentist, likes apples.
    1)        John has a friend.
    2)        The friend’s name is Tony.
    3)        Tony is a dentist.
    4) Tony likes apples.
    A very important property of the proposition is that it has a truth value. It is either true or false, e.g.
    The earth is round.
    The earth is flat.
    Propositional logic (propositional calculus or sentential calculus) is the study of the truth conditions for propositions: how the truth of a composite proposition (covering both compound and complex propositions) is determined by the truth value of its constituent (or component)propositions and the connections between them.
    The truth value of a composite proposition is said to be the function of, or is determined by, the truth value of its component propositions and the logical connectives used in it. Negation (one-place connective): if a proposition p is true, then its negation ~p (orᆨp) is false, and if p is false, then ~p is true, e.g. John is married. John is not married. Conjunction (two-place connective): The logical connective is symbolized as & (or ∧). If (only when and as long as) both p and q are true, then p & q will be true, e.g. John was poor and (but) he was honest.  Disjunction (two-place connective): The logical connective is symbolized as ∨.Only when and as long as one of the component proposition is true (or both are true), the composite proposition p ∨ q will be true, e.g. Either he did not pass the driving test or I am a Dutchman. Implication (also known as conditional: two-place connective): the logical connective is symbolized as →. As long as the consequent proposition q is true, the composite proposition p → q will be true, e.g. If Ann has passed her driving test, her parents have bought her a Porsche. p → q is true (i) if Ann has passed her driving test and her parents have bought her a Porsche (p & q) , (ii) if she has not passed her driving test and (but) her parents have bought her a Porsche (~p & q), and (iii) Ann has not passed her driving test and her parents have not bought her a Porsche (~p & ~q). Equivalence (also known as biconditional or bilateral implication: two-place connective): the logical connective is symbolized as ≡ (or ↔). That is p ≡ q equals (p → q) & (q → p), e.g. Ralph is Philip’s father. → Philip is Ralph’s son and Philip is Ralph’s son. → Ralph is Philip’s father. The condition for the composite proposition p ≡ q to be true is that if and only if both component propositions are of the same truth value, whether true or false.
    The truth table:
                and         or        if…then   if and only if…then
    p     q        p & q        p ∨ q        p → q        p ≡ q
    T     T            T            T            T            T
    T     F            F            T            F            F
    F     T            F            T            T            F
    F     F            F            F            T            T
    Entailment: a sense relation between sentences, e.g.
    a. John killed Bill.
    b.        Bill died
    a.        I saw a boy.
    b.        I saw a child
    When a is true, b is necessarily true.
    When b is false, a is false.
    When a is false, b may be true or false.
    When b is true, a may be true or false.
    When these requirements are met, a entails b.
    An integrated theory (associated with Katz, Fodor, Postal)
    Katz and Fodor, 1963. “The Structure of a Semantic Theory”.
    Katz and Postal, 1964. “An Integrated Theory of Language Description”.
    The idea that the meaning of a sentence depends on the meaning of the constituent words and the way in which these words are combined is usually known as the principle of compositionality. The integrated theory tried to put this principle into practice: describing the internal structure of the semantic component.
    According to them, the semantic theory consists of two parts: a dictionary and a set of projection rules. The dictionary provides the grammatical classification and semantic information of words. The former is more detailed than the traditional parts of speech or word classes, e.g. hit: a transitive verb {Vtr}, ball: a concrete noun {Nc}. {Vtr}, {Nc} and the like are termed as grammatical or syntactic markers. The latter is further classified into semantic markers and distinguishers. Semantic markers are more systematic and general, e.g. (Male), (Female), (Human), (Animal), etc. Distinguishers are more idiosyncratic or word specific, e.g. bachelor has the following distinguishers:
    A [who has never married]
    B [young knight serving under the standard of another knight]
    C [who has the first or lowest academic degree]
    D [young fur seal when without a mate during the breeding time]
    The projection rules are responsible for combining the meanings of words together, e.g. The man hits the colorful ball: the meanings of the words in NP2 are combined first, then this NP2 is combined with the V, then the meanings of the words in NP1 are combined, then NP1 is combined with V + NP2. This effectively provides a solution to the integration of syntax and semantics.
    In order to block the generation of sentences like Colorless green ideas sleep furiously, they also introduce some selection restrictions, e.g.
    Colorful {Adj}
    a. (color)[abounding in contrast or variety of bright colors]
    <(Physical Object) or (Social Activity)>:
    colorful ball, flowers, dress; colorful experiences, party, life
    b. (evaluative)[having distinctive character, vividness, picturesqueness]
    <(Aesthetic Object) or (Social Activity)>:
    Colorful description, story, scenery
    Ball {Nc}
    a. (Social Activity)(Large)(Assembly)[for the purpose of social dancing]
    b. (Physical Object)[having globular shape]
    c. (Physical Object)[solid missile for projection by engine of war]
    A projection rule will be in effect to combine the features of colorful and ball, resulting in the four readings of colorful ball:
    a. (Social Activity)(Large)(Assembly)(color)[abounding in contrast or variety of bright colors] [for the purpose of social dancing]
    b. (Physical Object) (color) [abounding in contrast or variety of bright colors] [having globular shape]
    c. (Physical Object) (color) [abounding in contrast or variety of bright colors] [solid missile for projection by engine of war]
    d. (Social Activity)(Large)(Assembly)(evaluative)[having distinctive character, vividness, picturesqueness] [for the purpose of social dancing]
    The other two combinations of the second reading of colorful and the second or the third readings of ball are blocked by the selection restrictions.
    In the end, the meanings of the whole sentence will be composed as shown below:
    a.        [some contextually definite] (Physical Object) (Human) (Male) (Action) (Instancy) (Intensity) [collides with an impact] [some contextually definite] (Physical Object) (Color) [abounding in contrast or variety of bright colors] [having globular shape]
    b. [some contextually definite] (Physical Object) (Human) (Male) (Action) (Instancy) (Intensity) [collides with an impact] [some contextually definite] (Physical Object) (Color) [abounding in contrast or variety of bright colors] [solid missile for projection by engine of war]
    c. [some contextually definite] (Physical Object) (Human) (Male) (Action) (Instancy) (Intensity) [strike with a blow or missile] [some contextually definite] (Physical Object) (Color) [abounding in contrast or variety of bright colors] [having globular shape]
    d. [some contextually definite] (Physical Object) (Human) (Male) (Action) (Instancy) (Intensity) [strike with a blow or missile] [some contextually definite] (Physical Object) (Color) [abounding in contrast or variety of bright colors] [solid missile for projection by engine of war]
    Problems:
    1)        The distinction between semantic marker and distinguisher is not very clear, e.g. having a globular shape can also be regarded as semantic marker since it is something general. Later, Katz dropped this distinction off.
    2)        There are cases in which the collocation of words cannot be accounted for by grammatical markers, semantic markers or selection restrictions, e.g.
    The girl gave her own dress away.
    *The girl gave his own dress away.
    My cousin is a male nurse.
    My cousin is a female nurse.
    3) This theory makes use of semantic markers which are elements of an artificial meta-language. To explain the meaning of the word man in terms of (Human), (Male), (Adult), one must go on to explain the meaning of theses semantic markers, otherwise they are meaningless.

    The final examination:
    1. Translation of terms in linguistics (20%)
      C – E (10%) 1 x 10
      E – C (10%) 1 x 10
    2. Definition of terms (16%)
      4 x 4
    3 – 10. Gap filling, analysis, etc. (50%)
    11, 12. Essay questions (14%)
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    0

    主题

    25

    帖子

    114

    积分

    一般战友

    Rank: 2

    精华
    0
    威望
    60
    K币
    54 元
    注册时间
    2010-10-15
    8
     楼主| 发表于 2010-11-6 13:54 | 只看该作者

    6

    Chapter 6 Language Processing in Mind
    I. introduction
    Language processing in mind is studied in psycholinguistics concerned mainly with the storage, comprehension, production and acquisition of language.
    Psycholinguistics attracts both linguists and psychologists. Linguists tend to favor descriptions of spontaneous speech as their main source of evidence, whereas psychologists mostly prefer experimental studies.
    At its heart, psycholinguistic work consists of two questions:
    1)        What knowledge of language is needed for us to use language?
    Tacit knowledge: knowledge of how to perform various acts.
    Explicit knowledge: knowledge of the processes or mechanisms used in these acts
    Four broad areas of language knowledge: semantics, syntax, phonology, pragmatics
    2)        What cognitive processes are involved in the ordinary use of language?
    Garden path sentences:
    The florist sent the flowers was very pleased.
    Indirect requests:
    Can you open the door, please?
    Sentences with ambiguity:
    The boy hit the girl with the boomerang.
    Metaphors:
    Some marriages are iceboxes.
    The information processing system
    Sensory stores
    The sensory stores take in the variety of colors, tones, tastes, and smells that we experience each day and retain them, for a brief time, in a raw, unanalyzed form. It is assumed that we have one sensory store for each sensory system, although only the visual and auditory stores have been studied in any detail.
    Working memory or short-term memory
    The storage function: It is severely limited in size and can hold approximately 7 plus or minus 2 units of information for a limited time.
    The processing function: it is related to the concept of processing capacity which refers to the total amount of cognitive resources we may devote to a task. When tasks are new or difficult, they require more processing capacity, thereby leaving less space available for the storage function.
    Permanent memory or long-term memory
    It is a repository of our knowledge of the world, including general knowledge and personal experiences. It holds all of the information we have retained from the past that is not currently active (not in working memory). These memories are used to interpret new experiences, and in turn the new events may be added to this storehouse of information.
    Semantic memory: holding organized knowledge of words, concepts, symbols, and objects. It includes such broad classes of information as motor skills (typing, swimming, bicycling, etc.), general knowledge (grammar, mathematics, history, etc.), spatial knowledge (the typical layout of a house, etc.), social skills (how to begin and end a conversation, when and how to visit a friend, etc.).
    Episodic memory: holding traces of events that are specific to a time and a place. This is the memory that we use to keep a record of our personal experiences. It thus varies from person to person and from time to time.
    Their relevance for language processing
    In comprehension, we may assume that as we hear a sentence the sounds are first stored briefly in the auditory sensory store. The sounds are held there for about 2 to 4 seconds, giving us more than enough time to recognize the auditory pattern. Pattern recognition occurs when information from one of the sensory stores is matched with information we retrieve from permanent memory. To recognize speech sounds we must identify some of the acoustic cues that are presented in the speech signal, such as the frequency of some of the sounds. At some point, after recognizing the sounds, we are able to organize them into syllables and eventually words, although it is not clear when and how this happens.
    As noted, working memory can hold only about seven units of information. This could simply be seven words, but since many sentences are much longer than this, we need some way to deal immediately with more than seven words. One way we do this is to chunk the words into grammatical constituents such as noun and verb phrases, thereby reducing the storage burden to perhaps 2 or 3 constituents. The processing function of working memory is used to organize words into the constituents.
    Permanent memory plays several roles. Semantic memory contains information on the speech sounds and words that we retrieve during pattern recognition. And while this process is going on, we are also building up an episodic memory representation of the ongoing discourse. That is, once we complete the processing of a given sentence, we might extract the gist of it and store that in episodic memory. Permanent memory would also be involved in finding antecedents for expressions such as pronouns; this would involve holding some information from previous sentences in memory long enough to establish coreferences.
    Structure and process
    It is generally agreed that the mind is likely to contain certain linguistic structures which are used in the course of various processes, such as comprehending and producing speech. Are these structures in language users’ mind the same as what is described in grammars? That is, are the grammatical structures described by linguists the same as the linguistic structures in language users’ mind? The grammatical structures described by linguists have psychological reality if they are the same as the linguistic structures in language users’ mind, because they are part of language processing. For example, in the standard theory of generative-transformational grammar the deep structures undergo transformations to become surface structures. If the transformations are really the mental processes when language users produce sentences these transformations have psychological reality.
    Bottom-up and top-down processes
    Bottom-up processing is defined as that which proceeds from the lowest level to the highest level of processing in such a way that all of the lower levels of processing operate without influence from the higher levels. That is the identification of phonemes is not affected by the lexical, syntactic, or discourse levels; the retrieval of words is not affected by syntactic or discourse levels, and so on.
    A top-down processing model, in contrast, states that information at the higher levels may influence processing at the lower levels. For instance, a sentence context may affect the identification of words within that sentence. Speaking intuitively we may say that a top-down model of processing is one in which one’s expectations play a significant role.
    Automatic and controlled processes
    We may have a fixed processing capacity for handling information. Tasks that draw substantially from this limited pool of resources are called controlled tasks, and the processes involved in these tasks are controlled processes. Tasks that do not require substantial resources are called automatic tasks, and processes that do not require extensive capacity are referred to as automatic processes.
    II. Language comprehension
    Word recognition
    One of the initial steps in understanding any message is the recognition of words. Word recognition is related to our knowledge of words, including their pronunciation (phonological knowledge), their internal structures (morphological knowledge), the word classes or parts of speech they belong to (syntactic knowledge), their definition or meaning (semantic knowledge). One common sense view of word recognition that receives a lot of support from experimental studies is the cohort theory. According to this theory, as soon as people hear speech, they start to narrow down the possible words that they may be hearing. If the first sound they hear is /s/, they eliminate all words beginning with other sounds; if the second sound is /p/, they eliminate many other possibilities. A word is recognized as soon as there is only one possibility left. That is, auditory word recognition begins with the formation of a group of words at the perception of the initial sound and proceeds sound by sound with the cohort of words decreasing as more sounds are perceived.
    One of the most important factors that affect word recognition is frequency effect: how frequently the word is used in a given discourse or context. It explains the additional ease with which a word is accessed due to its more frequent usage in the language. For example, better is more frequently used than debtor.
    People also recognized a word faster when they have just encountered it than when they have not recently encountered it. This is termed as recency effect. It describes the additional ease with which a word is recognized due to its repeated occurrence in the discourse or context. And it is possible to explain the frequency effect as the recency effect because frequent words are more likely to have been encountered than infrequent words.
    Another factor that is involved in word recognition is context. People recognize a word more readily when the preceding words provide an appropriate context for it. For example, people recognize the word aorta faster in The heart surgeon carefully cut into the wall of the right aorta than in This is the aorta.
    Lexical ambiguity
    a.        After taking the right turn at the intersection … (ambiguous: correct vs rightward)
    b.        After taking the left turn at the intersection … (unambiguous)
    People take longer to understand a than b. This suggests that the two meanings of the word right are accessed. Hence one of the two main theories: all the meanings associated with the words are accessed. Other experiments suggest that in some situations only one meaning (the more frequent meaning or the meaning favored in a given context) is initially accessed. Hence the other of the two main theories: only one meaning is accessed initially.
    Syntactic processing
    Parsing
    A first step in the process of understanding a sentence is to assign elements of its surface structure to linguistic categories. The result of parsing is an internal representation of the linguistic relationships within a sentence, usually in the form of a tree structure or phrase marker. For example,
                                         S
                                       
                              NP                 VP

                          Det      N         V         NP

                                                   Det        N
    The      actor     thanked  the      audience.
    We may think of parsing as a form of problem solving or decision making in the sense that we making decisions about where to place incoming words into the phrase marker we are building. It has been suggested that we make these decisions immediately as we encounter a word, a principle known as immediacy principle. That is, when we first see or hear a word, we access its meaning from permanent memory, identify its likely referent, and fit it into the syntactic structure of the sentence. The alternative to immediate processing is to take a wait-and-see approach: to postpone interpreting a word or phrase until it is clearer where the sentence is going. However, there is considerable evidence for the immediacy principle. Although immediacy of processing reduces memory load, it may lead to errors. Considering the garden path sentence,
    The florist sent the flowers was very pleased.
    Sometimes it is not easy to determine which structures and meaning a sentence has. For example, there are two possible structures associated with the sentence The cop saw the spy with the binoculars. Some ambiguities are due to the ambiguous category of some of the words in the sentence. In the expression the desert trains, should desert be taken as the subject of the verb trains or is it a modifier of the noun trains?
    The desert trains men to be hardy.
    The desert trains seldom run on time.
    Parsing strategies
    If we are making decisions about where words fit into the syntactic structure of a sentence, on what are these decisions based? Much work has been done on the strategies we use in parsing. Strategies are thought of as approaches to parsing that work much of the time, although they are baldly foolproof. We will discuss two strategies that have gathered considerable empirical support. Late closure strategy One Parsing strategy is called the late closure strategy. This strategy states that, wherever possible, we prefer to attach new items to the current constituent. A primary motivation for this strategy is that it reduces the burden on working memory during parsing.
    One example of late closure is the sentence below:
    Tom said that Bill had taken the cleaning out yesterday.
    Here the adverb yesterday may be attached to the main clause (Tom said …) or the subsequent subordinate clause (Bill had taken …) it has been argued that we tend to prefer the latter strategy.
    Minimal attachment strategy A second strategy is referred to as the minimal attachment strategy, which states that we prefer attaching new items into the phrase marker being constructed using the fewest syntactic nodes consistent with the rules of the language. For example, a sentence fragment such as Ernie kissed Marcie and her sister . . . could be interpreted as either a noun phrase conjunction (that is, both Marcie and her sister were recipients of a kiss) or as the beginning of a new noun phrase. According to minimal attachment, we prefer the former interpretation.
    Other evidence was found for the minimal attachment strategy. For example, consider the two sentences below:
    The city council argued the mayor's position forcefully
    The city council argued the mayor's position was correct.
    The first sentence is consistent with minimal attachment in that the adverb forcefully is attached to the current constituent, the VP. In contrast, the second sentence is a complement construction that requires building a new constituent.
    Semantics and sentence memory
    Memory for Meaning versus surface form or wording
    The key sentence:  a. Galileo, the great Italian scientist, sent a letter about it to him.
    The test sentences: b. A letter about it was sent to him by Galileo, the great Italian scientist.
                    c. Galileo, the great Italian scientist, sent him a letter about it.
                    d. He sent a letter about it to Galileo, the great Italian scientist.
    The results of the study were that if the test sentence was presented immediately after the key sentence, the subjects would recognize any change, syntactic or semantic. After as little as 60 syllables, however, subjects were likely to respond that they heard b or c. That is, after this short period of time they were not able to recognize syntactic changes that did not involve a change of meaning. For d the subjects’ performance was much more accurate and even after 120 syllables, they could still detect semantic changes with almost 100 percent accuracy. This seems to indicate that the syntactic details of linguistic material are not usually stored for a long time and that it is the semantic representation the subjects have available in their memory under normal circumstance.
    Propositions and sentence memory
    It appears that the exact linguistic form is not well retained and, moreover, additional, nonlinguistic information may play a major role in the retention process. Investigators have developed propositional models of sentence representation. All of the proposals assume that a sentence can be represented as a proposition consisting of two or more concepts and some form of relation between them. Thus, sentences (a), (b), (c) and (d), despite their superficial dissimilarities, all convey the same proposition.
    (a) George hit Harry
    Hit (George, Harry)
    (b) Harry was hit by George.
    (c) It was Harry who was hit by George
    (d) The one who hit Harry was George.
    More complex sentences convey more than one proposition. Sentence (e) could be represented as three separate propositions. Once again, these propositions may be realized linguistically in a very large number of ways
    (e) George got into an argument with Harry, hit him, and then left the bar.
    Initiated (George, Harry, argument)
    Hit (George, Harry)
    Left (George, bar)
    A rough description of the way a propositional representation of a sentence might be set up during comprehension is as follows. When we first encounter a sentence, we extract its meaning and construct a proposition that represents this meaning. At the same time, the surface form of the sentence is being retained in working memory. Since the meaning is usually of greater interest, more processing resources are devoted to the meaning than to the surface form.
    Inferences and Sentence Memory
    It has been argued that we routinely draw inferences in the course of comprehending new events and that these inferences become incorporated into our memory representations of the event. With the passage of time, it becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish what was presented from what was inferred. In one study, people's comprehension and retention of the sentences below were examined:
    John was trying to fix the birdhouse. He was looking for the nail when his father came out to watch him and to help him do the work.
    John was using the hammer to fix the birdhouse when his father came out to watch him and to help him do the work.
    The subjects believed that they heard the expression using the hammer which was not actually presented in the first sentence. The expression is what the subjects inferred from the first sentence and this inference became part of the subjects’ retention of the sentence.
    Basic Processes in reading
    Eye movement
    A useful way of investigating some of the processes involved in reading is to study the eye movement of people reading. While we feel that our eyes move smoothly across a page of text, the reality is quite different. Our eyes actually make a series of rapid movements known as saccades, and between saccades there are fixation periods lasting approximately 250 milliseconds. A point towards the beginning of a word is usually fixated, and there is a distance of approximately eight letters or spaces between successive fixations. While most fixations typically move forwards in the text, around 10 or 15 % of them involve the eyes fixating an earlier part of the text than the previous fixation, known as regressions. Of particular importance, information is obtained from the text only during fixations and not at all during saccades.
    The perceptual span
    How much information is extracted from a single fixation. Various methods have been used to measure what is known as the PEHCEPTUAL SPAN, which is the range of letters from which useful information is extracted. Not surprisingly, the perceptual span varies depending on factors such as the size of the print, the complexity of the text, and so on. It is typically the case, however, that the perceptual span encompasses about three or four letters to the left of fixation and some fifteen letters to the right of fixation. What appears to be happening is that it is more valuable to look ahead in the text rather than to look backwards to words which have already been processed. The fact that the perceptual span covers almost 20 letters means that some of the letters included in it do not fall within the focal region of the eye, which is the area of high acuity. What information is extracted from the area lying outside the fovea? Fairly complex studies have revealed that meaning is not extracted, but information about the identity of the letters is obtained.
    Discourse / text interpretations
    When we are trying to understand a sentence, we often make use of information that that is not contained directly within the sentence itself. This is known as contextual information, and we can distinguish between two kinds of contextual: general and specific. GENERAL CONTEXT EFFECTS occur when our general knowledge about the world influences language comprehension. SPECIFIC CONTEXT EFFECTS involve information obtained from earlier parts of a discourse.
    Schemata
    It is believed that SCHEMATA, meaning packets of stored knowledge, play an important role in language processing. The features of schemata are as follows:
    (1) Schemata can vary considerably in the information they contain, from the very simple to the very complex.
    (2) Schemata are frequently organized hierarchically, for example, in addition to a rather general restaurant schema or script, we probably also have more specific restaurant schemata for different kinds of restaurant (e. g. fast-food places, up market French restaurants, and so on).
    (3) Schemata operate on a top-down or conceptually driven way to facilitate interpretation of environmental stimuli.
    Activation of appropriate schemata
    We must activate the appropriate schemata to properly comprehend a story. The simplest case is the one in which we lack the appropriate schema. It has been demonstrated that the British college students had a very hard time understanding Eskimo folktales and tended to modify many of the details in their recall efforts, producing “a more coherent, concise, and undecorated tale.” It appears that comprehension and memory are poor when we do not have a schema that corresponds to the story that is unfolding, because it is nearly impossible to see the significance of the events being described.
    In other instances, we may have an appropriate schema in memory but fail to activate it for one reason or another. A series of studies have convincingly demonstrated that comprehension and memory will be poor when the passage is written so obscurely that we cannot determine what might be the right schema, as in the following example:
    With hocked gems financing him, our hero bravely defied all scornful laughter that tried to prevent his scheme. “Our eyes deceive,” he had said, “an egg not a table correctly typifies this unexplored planet.” Now three sturdy sisters sought proof, forging along sometimes through calm vastness, yet more often over turbulent peaks and valleys. Days became weeks as many doubters spread fearful rumors about the edge. At last from nowhere welcome winged creatures appeared signifying momentous success.
    Reconstruction of schema-specific details
    It has been argued that the activated schema serves as a retrieval plan, summoning up certain details rather than others by virtue of their centrality to the schema. Studies of comprehension with and without titles support this notion. For example, it was found that comprehenders who read a passage with one or two possible appropriate titles tended to emphasize different details in their recall. Thus, the perspective provided by the schema activated at the time of recoding seems to play an organizational role in our retrieval efforts.
    Language production
    More is known about language comprehension than language production.
    Speech production
    Speech production consists of four major stages: conceptualizing a thought to be expressed, formulating a linguistic plan, articulating the plan, and monitoring one’s speech.
    Conceptualizing thoughts to be expressed
    Very little can be said about the first stage. Basically, the questions here are, Where do ideas come from? And in what form do ideas exist before they are put into words? As to the latter question, psycholinguists and cognitive psychologists generally agree that some form of “mentalese” exists, that is, a representational system distinct from language. The notion is that thoughts take form in mentalese and are then translated into the linguistic form, but there is little agreement as to the properties of this pre-linguistic mental representation. The question of the origin of ideas may be even more intractable at this time, although some noteworthy efforts have been made to study the issue. Thus, we know that the first step occurs but are unable to say much about it.
    Formulating linguistic plans
    It has been suggested that the process of planning speech can be viewed as a series of stages, each devoted to one level of linguistic planning.
    Stage Process
    1    Identification of meaning – a meaning to be conveyed is generated
    2    Selection of a syntactic structure – a syntactic outline of the sentence is constructed, with word slots specified.
    3    Generation of intonation contour – the stress values of different word slots are assigned
    4    Insertion of content words – appropriate nouns, verbs, and adjectives are retrieved from the lexicon and placed into word slots.
    5   Formation of affixes and function words – function words (articles, conjunctions, prepositions, etc.) and suffixes are added.
    6    Specification of phonetic segments – the sentence is expressed in terms of phonetic segments, according to phonological rules
    The basic idea of this model is that we begin with the meaning that we wish to express and that subsequent levels of processing are devoted to specific and distinct aspects of the utterance. We set up a syntactic structure of the sentence, which specifies which words will receive major and minor stress and where the content words will fit in. Then the content words are added, followed by function words and affixes. Finally we identify the correct phonetic characteristics of the utterances, given this linguistic structure.
    Implementing linguistic plans
    Articulating
    Once we have formulated our thoughts into a linguistic plan, this information must be sent from the brain to the speech muscles so that they can execute the required movements and produce the desired sounds. Fluent articulation of speech requires the coordinate use of a large number of speech muscles, which are distributed over three systems: the respiratory, the laryngeal, and the supra-laryngeal or vocal tract. These three systems of speech muscles control those bodily organs responsible for the production of speech sounds
    Monitoring one’s speech
    From time to time, we spontaneously interrupt our speech and correct ourselves. These corrections are referred to as self-repairs. They have a characteristic structure that consists of three parts. First we interrupt ourselves after we have detected an error in our speech. Second, we usually utter one of various editing expressions, including such terms as uh, sorry, I mean, and so forth. Finally we repair the utterance.
    Corrections may occur within a word:
    We can go straight on to the ye-, -- to the orange node.
    They may also occur immediately after an error:
    Straight on to green, -- to red.
    They may be delayed by one or more words:
    And from green left to pink – er from blue left to pink.
    Although the major function of the editing expressions is to indicate that a correction follows, these editing expressions may have different connotations:
    Bill hit him – hit Sam, that is. (to further specify a potentially ambiguous referent)
    I am trying to lease, or rather, sublease, my apartment. (to substitute a word that is similar in meaning to the original word, but slightly closer to the speaker’s meaning)
    I really like to – I mean, hate to – get up in the morning. (for true errors)
    Three types of repairs have been identified:
    Again left to the same blank crossing point – white crossing point. (instant repair)
    And left to the purple crossing point – to the red crossing point. (anticipatory retracing)
    From yellow down to brown – no – that’s red. (fresh start)
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    0

    主题

    25

    帖子

    114

    积分

    一般战友

    Rank: 2

    精华
    0
    威望
    60
    K币
    54 元
    注册时间
    2010-10-15
    9
     楼主| 发表于 2010-11-6 14:17 | 只看该作者

    6

    Chapter 6 Language Processing in Mind
    I. introduction
    Language processing in mind is studied in psycholinguistics concerned mainly with the storage, comprehension, production and acquisition of language.
    Psycholinguistics attracts both linguists and psychologists. Linguists tend to favor descriptions of spontaneous speech as their main source of evidence, whereas psychologists mostly prefer experimental studies.
    At its heart, psycholinguistic work consists of two questions:
    1)        What knowledge of language is needed for us to use language?
    Tacit knowledge: knowledge of how to perform various acts.
    Explicit knowledge: knowledge of the processes or mechanisms used in these acts
    Four broad areas of language knowledge: semantics, syntax, phonology, pragmatics
    2)        What cognitive processes are involved in the ordinary use of language?
    Garden path sentences:
    The florist sent the flowers was very pleased.
    Indirect requests:
    Can you open the door, please?
    Sentences with ambiguity:
    The boy hit the girl with the boomerang.
    Metaphors:
    Some marriages are iceboxes.
    The information processing system
    Sensory stores
    The sensory stores take in the variety of colors, tones, tastes, and smells that we experience each day and retain them, for a brief time, in a raw, unanalyzed form. It is assumed that we have one sensory store for each sensory system, although only the visual and auditory stores have been studied in any detail.
    Working memory or short-term memory
    The storage function: It is severely limited in size and can hold approximately 7 plus or minus 2 units of information for a limited time.
    The processing function: it is related to the concept of processing capacity which refers to the total amount of cognitive resources we may devote to a task. When tasks are new or difficult, they require more processing capacity, thereby leaving less space available for the storage function.
    Permanent memory or long-term memory
    It is a repository of our knowledge of the world, including general knowledge and personal experiences. It holds all of the information we have retained from the past that is not currently active (not in working memory). These memories are used to interpret new experiences, and in turn the new events may be added to this storehouse of information.
    Semantic memory: holding organized knowledge of words, concepts, symbols, and objects. It includes such broad classes of information as motor skills (typing, swimming, bicycling, etc.), general knowledge (grammar, mathematics, history, etc.), spatial knowledge (the typical layout of a house, etc.), social skills (how to begin and end a conversation, when and how to visit a friend, etc.).
    Episodic memory: holding traces of events that are specific to a time and a place. This is the memory that we use to keep a record of our personal experiences. It thus varies from person to person and from time to time.
    Their relevance for language processing
    In comprehension, we may assume that as we hear a sentence the sounds are first stored briefly in the auditory sensory store. The sounds are held there for about 2 to 4 seconds, giving us more than enough time to recognize the auditory pattern. Pattern recognition occurs when information from one of the sensory stores is matched with information we retrieve from permanent memory. To recognize speech sounds we must identify some of the acoustic cues that are presented in the speech signal, such as the frequency of some of the sounds. At some point, after recognizing the sounds, we are able to organize them into syllables and eventually words, although it is not clear when and how this happens.
    As noted, working memory can hold only about seven units of information. This could simply be seven words, but since many sentences are much longer than this, we need some way to deal immediately with more than seven words. One way we do this is to chunk the words into grammatical constituents such as noun and verb phrases, thereby reducing the storage burden to perhaps 2 or 3 constituents. The processing function of working memory is used to organize words into the constituents.
    Permanent memory plays several roles. Semantic memory contains information on the speech sounds and words that we retrieve during pattern recognition. And while this process is going on, we are also building up an episodic memory representation of the ongoing discourse. That is, once we complete the processing of a given sentence, we might extract the gist of it and store that in episodic memory. Permanent memory would also be involved in finding antecedents for expressions such as pronouns; this would involve holding some information from previous sentences in memory long enough to establish coreferences.
    Structure and process
    It is generally agreed that the mind is likely to contain certain linguistic structures which are used in the course of various processes, such as comprehending and producing speech. Are these structures in language users’ mind the same as what is described in grammars? That is, are the grammatical structures described by linguists the same as the linguistic structures in language users’ mind? The grammatical structures described by linguists have psychological reality if they are the same as the linguistic structures in language users’ mind, because they are part of language processing. For example, in the standard theory of generative-transformational grammar the deep structures undergo transformations to become surface structures. If the transformations are really the mental processes when language users produce sentences these transformations have psychological reality.
    Bottom-up and top-down processes
    Bottom-up processing is defined as that which proceeds from the lowest level to the highest level of processing in such a way that all of the lower levels of processing operate without influence from the higher levels. That is the identification of phonemes is not affected by the lexical, syntactic, or discourse levels; the retrieval of words is not affected by syntactic or discourse levels, and so on.
    A top-down processing model, in contrast, states that information at the higher levels may influence processing at the lower levels. For instance, a sentence context may affect the identification of words within that sentence. Speaking intuitively we may say that a top-down model of processing is one in which one’s expectations play a significant role.
    Automatic and controlled processes
    We may have a fixed processing capacity for handling information. Tasks that draw substantially from this limited pool of resources are called controlled tasks, and the processes involved in these tasks are controlled processes. Tasks that do not require substantial resources are called automatic tasks, and processes that do not require extensive capacity are referred to as automatic processes.
    II. Language comprehension
    Word recognition
    One of the initial steps in understanding any message is the recognition of words. Word recognition is related to our knowledge of words, including their pronunciation (phonological knowledge), their internal structures (morphological knowledge), the word classes or parts of speech they belong to (syntactic knowledge), their definition or meaning (semantic knowledge). One common sense view of word recognition that receives a lot of support from experimental studies is the cohort theory. According to this theory, as soon as people hear speech, they start to narrow down the possible words that they may be hearing. If the first sound they hear is /s/, they eliminate all words beginning with other sounds; if the second sound is /p/, they eliminate many other possibilities. A word is recognized as soon as there is only one possibility left. That is, auditory word recognition begins with the formation of a group of words at the perception of the initial sound and proceeds sound by sound with the cohort of words decreasing as more sounds are perceived.
    One of the most important factors that affect word recognition is frequency effect: how frequently the word is used in a given discourse or context. It explains the additional ease with which a word is accessed due to its more frequent usage in the language. For example, better is more frequently used than debtor.
    People also recognized a word faster when they have just encountered it than when they have not recently encountered it. This is termed as recency effect. It describes the additional ease with which a word is recognized due to its repeated occurrence in the discourse or context. And it is possible to explain the frequency effect as the recency effect because frequent words are more likely to have been encountered than infrequent words.
    Another factor that is involved in word recognition is context. People recognize a word more readily when the preceding words provide an appropriate context for it. For example, people recognize the word aorta faster in The heart surgeon carefully cut into the wall of the right aorta than in This is the aorta.
    Lexical ambiguity
    a.        After taking the right turn at the intersection … (ambiguous: correct vs rightward)
    b.        After taking the left turn at the intersection … (unambiguous)
    People take longer to understand a than b. This suggests that the two meanings of the word right are accessed. Hence one of the two main theories: all the meanings associated with the words are accessed. Other experiments suggest that in some situations only one meaning (the more frequent meaning or the meaning favored in a given context) is initially accessed. Hence the other of the two main theories: only one meaning is accessed initially.
    Syntactic processing
    Parsing
    A first step in the process of understanding a sentence is to assign elements of its surface structure to linguistic categories. The result of parsing is an internal representation of the linguistic relationships within a sentence, usually in the form of a tree structure or phrase marker. For example,
                                         S
                                       
                              NP                 VP

                          Det      N         V         NP

                                                   Det        N
    The      actor     thanked  the      audience.
    We may think of parsing as a form of problem solving or decision making in the sense that we making decisions about where to place incoming words into the phrase marker we are building. It has been suggested that we make these decisions immediately as we encounter a word, a principle known as immediacy principle. That is, when we first see or hear a word, we access its meaning from permanent memory, identify its likely referent, and fit it into the syntactic structure of the sentence. The alternative to immediate processing is to take a wait-and-see approach: to postpone interpreting a word or phrase until it is clearer where the sentence is going. However, there is considerable evidence for the immediacy principle. Although immediacy of processing reduces memory load, it may lead to errors. Considering the garden path sentence,
    The florist sent the flowers was very pleased.
    Sometimes it is not easy to determine which structures and meaning a sentence has. For example, there are two possible structures associated with the sentence The cop saw the spy with the binoculars. Some ambiguities are due to the ambiguous category of some of the words in the sentence. In the expression the desert trains, should desert be taken as the subject of the verb trains or is it a modifier of the noun trains?
    The desert trains men to be hardy.
    The desert trains seldom run on time.
    Parsing strategies
    If we are making decisions about where words fit into the syntactic structure of a sentence, on what are these decisions based? Much work has been done on the strategies we use in parsing. Strategies are thought of as approaches to parsing that work much of the time, although they are baldly foolproof. We will discuss two strategies that have gathered considerable empirical support. Late closure strategy One Parsing strategy is called the late closure strategy. This strategy states that, wherever possible, we prefer to attach new items to the current constituent. A primary motivation for this strategy is that it reduces the burden on working memory during parsing.
    One example of late closure is the sentence below:
    Tom said that Bill had taken the cleaning out yesterday.
    Here the adverb yesterday may be attached to the main clause (Tom said …) or the subsequent subordinate clause (Bill had taken …) it has been argued that we tend to prefer the latter strategy.
    Minimal attachment strategy A second strategy is referred to as the minimal attachment strategy, which states that we prefer attaching new items into the phrase marker being constructed using the fewest syntactic nodes consistent with the rules of the language. For example, a sentence fragment such as Ernie kissed Marcie and her sister . . . could be interpreted as either a noun phrase conjunction (that is, both Marcie and her sister were recipients of a kiss) or as the beginning of a new noun phrase. According to minimal attachment, we prefer the former interpretation.
    Other evidence was found for the minimal attachment strategy. For example, consider the two sentences below:
    The city council argued the mayor's position forcefully
    The city council argued the mayor's position was correct.
    The first sentence is consistent with minimal attachment in that the adverb forcefully is attached to the current constituent, the VP. In contrast, the second sentence is a complement construction that requires building a new constituent.
    Semantics and sentence memory
    Memory for Meaning versus surface form or wording
    The key sentence:  a. Galileo, the great Italian scientist, sent a letter about it to him.
    The test sentences: b. A letter about it was sent to him by Galileo, the great Italian scientist.
                    c. Galileo, the great Italian scientist, sent him a letter about it.
                    d. He sent a letter about it to Galileo, the great Italian scientist.
    The results of the study were that if the test sentence was presented immediately after the key sentence, the subjects would recognize any change, syntactic or semantic. After as little as 60 syllables, however, subjects were likely to respond that they heard b or c. That is, after this short period of time they were not able to recognize syntactic changes that did not involve a change of meaning. For d the subjects’ performance was much more accurate and even after 120 syllables, they could still detect semantic changes with almost 100 percent accuracy. This seems to indicate that the syntactic details of linguistic material are not usually stored for a long time and that it is the semantic representation the subjects have available in their memory under normal circumstance.
    Propositions and sentence memory
    It appears that the exact linguistic form is not well retained and, moreover, additional, nonlinguistic information may play a major role in the retention process. Investigators have developed propositional models of sentence representation. All of the proposals assume that a sentence can be represented as a proposition consisting of two or more concepts and some form of relation between them. Thus, sentences (a), (b), (c) and (d), despite their superficial dissimilarities, all convey the same proposition.
    (a) George hit Harry
    Hit (George, Harry)
    (b) Harry was hit by George.
    (c) It was Harry who was hit by George
    (d) The one who hit Harry was George.
    More complex sentences convey more than one proposition. Sentence (e) could be represented as three separate propositions. Once again, these propositions may be realized linguistically in a very large number of ways
    (e) George got into an argument with Harry, hit him, and then left the bar.
    Initiated (George, Harry, argument)
    Hit (George, Harry)
    Left (George, bar)
    A rough description of the way a propositional representation of a sentence might be set up during comprehension is as follows. When we first encounter a sentence, we extract its meaning and construct a proposition that represents this meaning. At the same time, the surface form of the sentence is being retained in working memory. Since the meaning is usually of greater interest, more processing resources are devoted to the meaning than to the surface form.
    Inferences and Sentence Memory
    It has been argued that we routinely draw inferences in the course of comprehending new events and that these inferences become incorporated into our memory representations of the event. With the passage of time, it becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish what was presented from what was inferred. In one study, people's comprehension and retention of the sentences below were examined:
    John was trying to fix the birdhouse. He was looking for the nail when his father came out to watch him and to help him do the work.
    John was using the hammer to fix the birdhouse when his father came out to watch him and to help him do the work.
    The subjects believed that they heard the expression using the hammer which was not actually presented in the first sentence. The expression is what the subjects inferred from the first sentence and this inference became part of the subjects’ retention of the sentence.
    Basic Processes in reading
    Eye movement
    A useful way of investigating some of the processes involved in reading is to study the eye movement of people reading. While we feel that our eyes move smoothly across a page of text, the reality is quite different. Our eyes actually make a series of rapid movements known as saccades, and between saccades there are fixation periods lasting approximately 250 milliseconds. A point towards the beginning of a word is usually fixated, and there is a distance of approximately eight letters or spaces between successive fixations. While most fixations typically move forwards in the text, around 10 or 15 % of them involve the eyes fixating an earlier part of the text than the previous fixation, known as regressions. Of particular importance, information is obtained from the text only during fixations and not at all during saccades.
    The perceptual span
    How much information is extracted from a single fixation. Various methods have been used to measure what is known as the PEHCEPTUAL SPAN, which is the range of letters from which useful information is extracted. Not surprisingly, the perceptual span varies depending on factors such as the size of the print, the complexity of the text, and so on. It is typically the case, however, that the perceptual span encompasses about three or four letters to the left of fixation and some fifteen letters to the right of fixation. What appears to be happening is that it is more valuable to look ahead in the text rather than to look backwards to words which have already been processed. The fact that the perceptual span covers almost 20 letters means that some of the letters included in it do not fall within the focal region of the eye, which is the area of high acuity. What information is extracted from the area lying outside the fovea? Fairly complex studies have revealed that meaning is not extracted, but information about the identity of the letters is obtained.
    Discourse / text interpretations
    When we are trying to understand a sentence, we often make use of information that that is not contained directly within the sentence itself. This is known as contextual information, and we can distinguish between two kinds of contextual: general and specific. GENERAL CONTEXT EFFECTS occur when our general knowledge about the world influences language comprehension. SPECIFIC CONTEXT EFFECTS involve information obtained from earlier parts of a discourse.
    Schemata
    It is believed that SCHEMATA, meaning packets of stored knowledge, play an important role in language processing. The features of schemata are as follows:
    (1) Schemata can vary considerably in the information they contain, from the very simple to the very complex.
    (2) Schemata are frequently organized hierarchically, for example, in addition to a rather general restaurant schema or script, we probably also have more specific restaurant schemata for different kinds of restaurant (e. g. fast-food places, up market French restaurants, and so on).
    (3) Schemata operate on a top-down or conceptually driven way to facilitate interpretation of environmental stimuli.
    Activation of appropriate schemata
    We must activate the appropriate schemata to properly comprehend a story. The simplest case is the one in which we lack the appropriate schema. It has been demonstrated that the British college students had a very hard time understanding Eskimo folktales and tended to modify many of the details in their recall efforts, producing “a more coherent, concise, and undecorated tale.” It appears that comprehension and memory are poor when we do not have a schema that corresponds to the story that is unfolding, because it is nearly impossible to see the significance of the events being described.
    In other instances, we may have an appropriate schema in memory but fail to activate it for one reason or another. A series of studies have convincingly demonstrated that comprehension and memory will be poor when the passage is written so obscurely that we cannot determine what might be the right schema, as in the following example:
    With hocked gems financing him, our hero bravely defied all scornful laughter that tried to prevent his scheme. “Our eyes deceive,” he had said, “an egg not a table correctly typifies this unexplored planet.” Now three sturdy sisters sought proof, forging along sometimes through calm vastness, yet more often over turbulent peaks and valleys. Days became weeks as many doubters spread fearful rumors about the edge. At last from nowhere welcome winged creatures appeared signifying momentous success.
    Reconstruction of schema-specific details
    It has been argued that the activated schema serves as a retrieval plan, summoning up certain details rather than others by virtue of their centrality to the schema. Studies of comprehension with and without titles support this notion. For example, it was found that comprehenders who read a passage with one or two possible appropriate titles tended to emphasize different details in their recall. Thus, the perspective provided by the schema activated at the time of recoding seems to play an organizational role in our retrieval efforts.
    Language production
    More is known about language comprehension than language production.
    Speech production
    Speech production consists of four major stages: conceptualizing a thought to be expressed, formulating a linguistic plan, articulating the plan, and monitoring one’s speech.
    Conceptualizing thoughts to be expressed
    Very little can be said about the first stage. Basically, the questions here are, Where do ideas come from? And in what form do ideas exist before they are put into words? As to the latter question, psycholinguists and cognitive psychologists generally agree that some form of “mentalese” exists, that is, a representational system distinct from language. The notion is that thoughts take form in mentalese and are then translated into the linguistic form, but there is little agreement as to the properties of this pre-linguistic mental representation. The question of the origin of ideas may be even more intractable at this time, although some noteworthy efforts have been made to study the issue. Thus, we know that the first step occurs but are unable to say much about it.
    Formulating linguistic plans
    It has been suggested that the process of planning speech can be viewed as a series of stages, each devoted to one level of linguistic planning.
    Stage Process
    1    Identification of meaning – a meaning to be conveyed is generated
    2    Selection of a syntactic structure – a syntactic outline of the sentence is constructed, with word slots specified.
    3    Generation of intonation contour – the stress values of different word slots are assigned
    4    Insertion of content words – appropriate nouns, verbs, and adjectives are retrieved from the lexicon and placed into word slots.
    5   Formation of affixes and function words – function words (articles, conjunctions, prepositions, etc.) and suffixes are added.
    6    Specification of phonetic segments – the sentence is expressed in terms of phonetic segments, according to phonological rules
    The basic idea of this model is that we begin with the meaning that we wish to express and that subsequent levels of processing are devoted to specific and distinct aspects of the utterance. We set up a syntactic structure of the sentence, which specifies which words will receive major and minor stress and where the content words will fit in. Then the content words are added, followed by function words and affixes. Finally we identify the correct phonetic characteristics of the utterances, given this linguistic structure.
    Implementing linguistic plans
    Articulating
    Once we have formulated our thoughts into a linguistic plan, this information must be sent from the brain to the speech muscles so that they can execute the required movements and produce the desired sounds. Fluent articulation of speech requires the coordinate use of a large number of speech muscles, which are distributed over three systems: the respiratory, the laryngeal, and the supra-laryngeal or vocal tract. These three systems of speech muscles control those bodily organs responsible for the production of speech sounds
    Monitoring one’s speech
    From time to time, we spontaneously interrupt our speech and correct ourselves. These corrections are referred to as self-repairs. They have a characteristic structure that consists of three parts. First we interrupt ourselves after we have detected an error in our speech. Second, we usually utter one of various editing expressions, including such terms as uh, sorry, I mean, and so forth. Finally we repair the utterance.
    Corrections may occur within a word:
    We can go straight on to the ye-, -- to the orange node.
    They may also occur immediately after an error:
    Straight on to green, -- to red.
    They may be delayed by one or more words:
    And from green left to pink – er from blue left to pink.
    Although the major function of the editing expressions is to indicate that a correction follows, these editing expressions may have different connotations:
    Bill hit him – hit Sam, that is. (to further specify a potentially ambiguous referent)
    I am trying to lease, or rather, sublease, my apartment. (to substitute a word that is similar in meaning to the original word, but slightly closer to the speaker’s meaning)
    I really like to – I mean, hate to – get up in the morning. (for true errors)
    Three types of repairs have been identified:
    Again left to the same blank crossing point – white crossing point. (instant repair)
    And left to the purple crossing point – to the red crossing point. (anticipatory retracing)
    From yellow down to brown – no – that’s red. (fresh start)
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    0

    主题

    25

    帖子

    114

    积分

    一般战友

    Rank: 2

    精华
    0
    威望
    60
    K币
    54 元
    注册时间
    2010-10-15
    10
     楼主| 发表于 2010-11-6 23:50 | 只看该作者

    6

    Chapter 6 Language Processing in Mind
    I. introduction
    Language processing in mind is studied in psycholinguistics concerned mainly with the storage, comprehension, production and acquisition of language.
    Psycholinguistics attracts both linguists and psychologists. Linguists tend to favor descriptions of spontaneous speech as their main source of evidence, whereas psychologists mostly prefer experimental studies.
    At its heart, psycholinguistic work consists of two questions:
    1)        What knowledge of language is needed for us to use language?
    Tacit knowledge: knowledge of how to perform various acts.
    Explicit knowledge: knowledge of the processes or mechanisms used in these acts
    Four broad areas of language knowledge: semantics, syntax, phonology, pragmatics
    2)        What cognitive processes are involved in the ordinary use of language?
    Garden path sentences:
    The florist sent the flowers was very pleased.
    Indirect requests:
    Can you open the door, please?
    Sentences with ambiguity:
    The boy hit the girl with the boomerang.
    Metaphors:
    Some marriages are iceboxes.
    The information processing system
    Sensory stores
    The sensory stores take in the variety of colors, tones, tastes, and smells that we experience each day and retain them, for a brief time, in a raw, unanalyzed form. It is assumed that we have one sensory store for each sensory system, although only the visual and auditory stores have been studied in any detail.
    Working memory or short-term memory
    The storage function: It is severely limited in size and can hold approximately 7 plus or minus 2 units of information for a limited time.
    The processing function: it is related to the concept of processing capacity which refers to the total amount of cognitive resources we may devote to a task. When tasks are new or difficult, they require more processing capacity, thereby leaving less space available for the storage function.
    Permanent memory or long-term memory
    It is a repository of our knowledge of the world, including general knowledge and personal experiences. It holds all of the information we have retained from the past that is not currently active (not in working memory). These memories are used to interpret new experiences, and in turn the new events may be added to this storehouse of information.
    Semantic memory: holding organized knowledge of words, concepts, symbols, and objects. It includes such broad classes of information as motor skills (typing, swimming, bicycling, etc.), general knowledge (grammar, mathematics, history, etc.), spatial knowledge (the typical layout of a house, etc.), social skills (how to begin and end a conversation, when and how to visit a friend, etc.).
    Episodic memory: holding traces of events that are specific to a time and a place. This is the memory that we use to keep a record of our personal experiences. It thus varies from person to person and from time to time.
    Their relevance for language processing
    In comprehension, we may assume that as we hear a sentence the sounds are first stored briefly in the auditory sensory store. The sounds are held there for about 2 to 4 seconds, giving us more than enough time to recognize the auditory pattern. Pattern recognition occurs when information from one of the sensory stores is matched with information we retrieve from permanent memory. To recognize speech sounds we must identify some of the acoustic cues that are presented in the speech signal, such as the frequency of some of the sounds. At some point, after recognizing the sounds, we are able to organize them into syllables and eventually words, although it is not clear when and how this happens.
    As noted, working memory can hold only about seven units of information. This could simply be seven words, but since many sentences are much longer than this, we need some way to deal immediately with more than seven words. One way we do this is to chunk the words into grammatical constituents such as noun and verb phrases, thereby reducing the storage burden to perhaps 2 or 3 constituents. The processing function of working memory is used to organize words into the constituents.
    Permanent memory plays several roles. Semantic memory contains information on the speech sounds and words that we retrieve during pattern recognition. And while this process is going on, we are also building up an episodic memory representation of the ongoing discourse. That is, once we complete the processing of a given sentence, we might extract the gist of it and store that in episodic memory. Permanent memory would also be involved in finding antecedents for expressions such as pronouns; this would involve holding some information from previous sentences in memory long enough to establish coreferences.
    Structure and process
    It is generally agreed that the mind is likely to contain certain linguistic structures which are used in the course of various processes, such as comprehending and producing speech. Are these structures in language users’ mind the same as what is described in grammars? That is, are the grammatical structures described by linguists the same as the linguistic structures in language users’ mind? The grammatical structures described by linguists have psychological reality if they are the same as the linguistic structures in language users’ mind, because they are part of language processing. For example, in the standard theory of generative-transformational grammar the deep structures undergo transformations to become surface structures. If the transformations are really the mental processes when language users produce sentences these transformations have psychological reality.
    Bottom-up and top-down processes
    Bottom-up processing is defined as that which proceeds from the lowest level to the highest level of processing in such a way that all of the lower levels of processing operate without influence from the higher levels. That is the identification of phonemes is not affected by the lexical, syntactic, or discourse levels; the retrieval of words is not affected by syntactic or discourse levels, and so on.
    A top-down processing model, in contrast, states that information at the higher levels may influence processing at the lower levels. For instance, a sentence context may affect the identification of words within that sentence. Speaking intuitively we may say that a top-down model of processing is one in which one’s expectations play a significant role.
    Automatic and controlled processes
    We may have a fixed processing capacity for handling information. Tasks that draw substantially from this limited pool of resources are called controlled tasks, and the processes involved in these tasks are controlled processes. Tasks that do not require substantial resources are called automatic tasks, and processes that do not require extensive capacity are referred to as automatic processes.
    II. Language comprehension
    Word recognition
    One of the initial steps in understanding any message is the recognition of words. Word recognition is related to our knowledge of words, including their pronunciation (phonological knowledge), their internal structures (morphological knowledge), the word classes or parts of speech they belong to (syntactic knowledge), their definition or meaning (semantic knowledge). One common sense view of word recognition that receives a lot of support from experimental studies is the cohort theory. According to this theory, as soon as people hear speech, they start to narrow down the possible words that they may be hearing. If the first sound they hear is /s/, they eliminate all words beginning with other sounds; if the second sound is /p/, they eliminate many other possibilities. A word is recognized as soon as there is only one possibility left. That is, auditory word recognition begins with the formation of a group of words at the perception of the initial sound and proceeds sound by sound with the cohort of words decreasing as more sounds are perceived.
    One of the most important factors that affect word recognition is frequency effect: how frequently the word is used in a given discourse or context. It explains the additional ease with which a word is accessed due to its more frequent usage in the language. For example, better is more frequently used than debtor.
    People also recognized a word faster when they have just encountered it than when they have not recently encountered it. This is termed as recency effect. It describes the additional ease with which a word is recognized due to its repeated occurrence in the discourse or context. And it is possible to explain the frequency effect as the recency effect because frequent words are more likely to have been encountered than infrequent words.
    Another factor that is involved in word recognition is context. People recognize a word more readily when the preceding words provide an appropriate context for it. For example, people recognize the word aorta faster in The heart surgeon carefully cut into the wall of the right aorta than in This is the aorta.
    Lexical ambiguity
    a.        After taking the right turn at the intersection … (ambiguous: correct vs rightward)
    b.        After taking the left turn at the intersection … (unambiguous)
    People take longer to understand a than b. This suggests that the two meanings of the word right are accessed. Hence one of the two main theories: all the meanings associated with the words are accessed. Other experiments suggest that in some situations only one meaning (the more frequent meaning or the meaning favored in a given context) is initially accessed. Hence the other of the two main theories: only one meaning is accessed initially.
    Syntactic processing
    Parsing
    A first step in the process of understanding a sentence is to assign elements of its surface structure to linguistic categories. The result of parsing is an internal representation of the linguistic relationships within a sentence, usually in the form of a tree structure or phrase marker. For example,
                                         S
                                       
                              NP                 VP

                          Det      N         V         NP

                                                   Det        N
    The      actor     thanked  the      audience.
    We may think of parsing as a form of problem solving or decision making in the sense that we making decisions about where to place incoming words into the phrase marker we are building. It has been suggested that we make these decisions immediately as we encounter a word, a principle known as immediacy principle. That is, when we first see or hear a word, we access its meaning from permanent memory, identify its likely referent, and fit it into the syntactic structure of the sentence. The alternative to immediate processing is to take a wait-and-see approach: to postpone interpreting a word or phrase until it is clearer where the sentence is going. However, there is considerable evidence for the immediacy principle. Although immediacy of processing reduces memory load, it may lead to errors. Considering the garden path sentence,
    The florist sent the flowers was very pleased.
    Sometimes it is not easy to determine which structures and meaning a sentence has. For example, there are two possible structures associated with the sentence The cop saw the spy with the binoculars. Some ambiguities are due to the ambiguous category of some of the words in the sentence. In the expression the desert trains, should desert be taken as the subject of the verb trains or is it a modifier of the noun trains?
    The desert trains men to be hardy.
    The desert trains seldom run on time.
    Parsing strategies
    If we are making decisions about where words fit into the syntactic structure of a sentence, on what are these decisions based? Much work has been done on the strategies we use in parsing. Strategies are thought of as approaches to parsing that work much of the time, although they are baldly foolproof. We will discuss two strategies that have gathered considerable empirical support. Late closure strategy One Parsing strategy is called the late closure strategy. This strategy states that, wherever possible, we prefer to attach new items to the current constituent. A primary motivation for this strategy is that it reduces the burden on working memory during parsing.
    One example of late closure is the sentence below:
    Tom said that Bill had taken the cleaning out yesterday.
    Here the adverb yesterday may be attached to the main clause (Tom said …) or the subsequent subordinate clause (Bill had taken …) it has been argued that we tend to prefer the latter strategy.
    Minimal attachment strategy A second strategy is referred to as the minimal attachment strategy, which states that we prefer attaching new items into the phrase marker being constructed using the fewest syntactic nodes consistent with the rules of the language. For example, a sentence fragment such as Ernie kissed Marcie and her sister . . . could be interpreted as either a noun phrase conjunction (that is, both Marcie and her sister were recipients of a kiss) or as the beginning of a new noun phrase. According to minimal attachment, we prefer the former interpretation.
    Other evidence was found for the minimal attachment strategy. For example, consider the two sentences below:
    The city council argued the mayor's position forcefully
    The city council argued the mayor's position was correct.
    The first sentence is consistent with minimal attachment in that the adverb forcefully is attached to the current constituent, the VP. In contrast, the second sentence is a complement construction that requires building a new constituent.
    Semantics and sentence memory
    Memory for Meaning versus surface form or wording
    The key sentence:  a. Galileo, the great Italian scientist, sent a letter about it to him.
    The test sentences: b. A letter about it was sent to him by Galileo, the great Italian scientist.
                    c. Galileo, the great Italian scientist, sent him a letter about it.
                    d. He sent a letter about it to Galileo, the great Italian scientist.
    The results of the study were that if the test sentence was presented immediately after the key sentence, the subjects would recognize any change, syntactic or semantic. After as little as 60 syllables, however, subjects were likely to respond that they heard b or c. That is, after this short period of time they were not able to recognize syntactic changes that did not involve a change of meaning. For d the subjects’ performance was much more accurate and even after 120 syllables, they could still detect semantic changes with almost 100 percent accuracy. This seems to indicate that the syntactic details of linguistic material are not usually stored for a long time and that it is the semantic representation the subjects have available in their memory under normal circumstance.
    Propositions and sentence memory
    It appears that the exact linguistic form is not well retained and, moreover, additional, nonlinguistic information may play a major role in the retention process. Investigators have developed propositional models of sentence representation. All of the proposals assume that a sentence can be represented as a proposition consisting of two or more concepts and some form of relation between them. Thus, sentences (a), (b), (c) and (d), despite their superficial dissimilarities, all convey the same proposition.
    (a) George hit Harry
    Hit (George, Harry)
    (b) Harry was hit by George.
    (c) It was Harry who was hit by George
    (d) The one who hit Harry was George.
    More complex sentences convey more than one proposition. Sentence (e) could be represented as three separate propositions. Once again, these propositions may be realized linguistically in a very large number of ways
    (e) George got into an argument with Harry, hit him, and then left the bar.
    Initiated (George, Harry, argument)
    Hit (George, Harry)
    Left (George, bar)
    A rough description of the way a propositional representation of a sentence might be set up during comprehension is as follows. When we first encounter a sentence, we extract its meaning and construct a proposition that represents this meaning. At the same time, the surface form of the sentence is being retained in working memory. Since the meaning is usually of greater interest, more processing resources are devoted to the meaning than to the surface form.
    Inferences and Sentence Memory
    It has been argued that we routinely draw inferences in the course of comprehending new events and that these inferences become incorporated into our memory representations of the event. With the passage of time, it becomes increasingly difficult to distinguish what was presented from what was inferred. In one study, people's comprehension and retention of the sentences below were examined:
    John was trying to fix the birdhouse. He was looking for the nail when his father came out to watch him and to help him do the work.
    John was using the hammer to fix the birdhouse when his father came out to watch him and to help him do the work.
    The subjects believed that they heard the expression using the hammer which was not actually presented in the first sentence. The expression is what the subjects inferred from the first sentence and this inference became part of the subjects’ retention of the sentence.
    Basic Processes in reading
    Eye movement
    A useful way of investigating some of the processes involved in reading is to study the eye movement of people reading. While we feel that our eyes move smoothly across a page of text, the reality is quite different. Our eyes actually make a series of rapid movements known as saccades, and between saccades there are fixation periods lasting approximately 250 milliseconds. A point towards the beginning of a word is usually fixated, and there is a distance of approximately eight letters or spaces between successive fixations. While most fixations typically move forwards in the text, around 10 or 15 % of them involve the eyes fixating an earlier part of the text than the previous fixation, known as regressions. Of particular importance, information is obtained from the text only during fixations and not at all during saccades.
    The perceptual span
    How much information is extracted from a single fixation. Various methods have been used to measure what is known as the PEHCEPTUAL SPAN, which is the range of letters from which useful information is extracted. Not surprisingly, the perceptual span varies depending on factors such as the size of the print, the complexity of the text, and so on. It is typically the case, however, that the perceptual span encompasses about three or four letters to the left of fixation and some fifteen letters to the right of fixation. What appears to be happening is that it is more valuable to look ahead in the text rather than to look backwards to words which have already been processed. The fact that the perceptual span covers almost 20 letters means that some of the letters included in it do not fall within the focal region of the eye, which is the area of high acuity. What information is extracted from the area lying outside the fovea? Fairly complex studies have revealed that meaning is not extracted, but information about the identity of the letters is obtained.
    Discourse / text interpretations
    When we are trying to understand a sentence, we often make use of information that that is not contained directly within the sentence itself. This is known as contextual information, and we can distinguish between two kinds of contextual: general and specific. GENERAL CONTEXT EFFECTS occur when our general knowledge about the world influences language comprehension. SPECIFIC CONTEXT EFFECTS involve information obtained from earlier parts of a discourse.
    Schemata
    It is believed that SCHEMATA, meaning packets of stored knowledge, play an important role in language processing. The features of schemata are as follows:
    (1) Schemata can vary considerably in the information they contain, from the very simple to the very complex.
    (2) Schemata are frequently organized hierarchically, for example, in addition to a rather general restaurant schema or script, we probably also have more specific restaurant schemata for different kinds of restaurant (e. g. fast-food places, up market French restaurants, and so on).
    (3) Schemata operate on a top-down or conceptually driven way to facilitate interpretation of environmental stimuli.
    Activation of appropriate schemata
    We must activate the appropriate schemata to properly comprehend a story. The simplest case is the one in which we lack the appropriate schema. It has been demonstrated that the British college students had a very hard time understanding Eskimo folktales and tended to modify many of the details in their recall efforts, producing “a more coherent, concise, and undecorated tale.” It appears that comprehension and memory are poor when we do not have a schema that corresponds to the story that is unfolding, because it is nearly impossible to see the significance of the events being described.
    In other instances, we may have an appropriate schema in memory but fail to activate it for one reason or another. A series of studies have convincingly demonstrated that comprehension and memory will be poor when the passage is written so obscurely that we cannot determine what might be the right schema, as in the following example:
    With hocked gems financing him, our hero bravely defied all scornful laughter that tried to prevent his scheme. “Our eyes deceive,” he had said, “an egg not a table correctly typifies this unexplored planet.” Now three sturdy sisters sought proof, forging along sometimes through calm vastness, yet more often over turbulent peaks and valleys. Days became weeks as many doubters spread fearful rumors about the edge. At last from nowhere welcome winged creatures appeared signifying momentous success.
    Reconstruction of schema-specific details
    It has been argued that the activated schema serves as a retrieval plan, summoning up certain details rather than others by virtue of their centrality to the schema. Studies of comprehension with and without titles support this notion. For example, it was found that comprehenders who read a passage with one or two possible appropriate titles tended to emphasize different details in their recall. Thus, the perspective provided by the schema activated at the time of recoding seems to play an organizational role in our retrieval efforts.
    Language production
    More is known about language comprehension than language production.
    Speech production
    Speech production consists of four major stages: conceptualizing a thought to be expressed, formulating a linguistic plan, articulating the plan, and monitoring one’s speech.
    Conceptualizing thoughts to be expressed
    Very little can be said about the first stage. Basically, the questions here are, Where do ideas come from? And in what form do ideas exist before they are put into words? As to the latter question, psycholinguists and cognitive psychologists generally agree that some form of “mentalese” exists, that is, a representational system distinct from language. The notion is that thoughts take form in mentalese and are then translated into the linguistic form, but there is little agreement as to the properties of this pre-linguistic mental representation. The question of the origin of ideas may be even more intractable at this time, although some noteworthy efforts have been made to study the issue. Thus, we know that the first step occurs but are unable to say much about it.
    Formulating linguistic plans
    It has been suggested that the process of planning speech can be viewed as a series of stages, each devoted to one level of linguistic planning.
    Stage Process
    1    Identification of meaning – a meaning to be conveyed is generated
    2    Selection of a syntactic structure – a syntactic outline of the sentence is constructed, with word slots specified.
    3    Generation of intonation contour – the stress values of different word slots are assigned
    4    Insertion of content words – appropriate nouns, verbs, and adjectives are retrieved from the lexicon and placed into word slots.
    5   Formation of affixes and function words – function words (articles, conjunctions, prepositions, etc.) and suffixes are added.
    6    Specification of phonetic segments – the sentence is expressed in terms of phonetic segments, according to phonological rules
    The basic idea of this model is that we begin with the meaning that we wish to express and that subsequent levels of processing are devoted to specific and distinct aspects of the utterance. We set up a syntactic structure of the sentence, which specifies which words will receive major and minor stress and where the content words will fit in. Then the content words are added, followed by function words and affixes. Finally we identify the correct phonetic characteristics of the utterances, given this linguistic structure.
    Implementing linguistic plans
    Articulating
    Once we have formulated our thoughts into a linguistic plan, this information must be sent from the brain to the speech muscles so that they can execute the required movements and produce the desired sounds. Fluent articulation of speech requires the coordinate use of a large number of speech muscles, which are distributed over three systems: the respiratory, the laryngeal, and the supra-laryngeal or vocal tract. These three systems of speech muscles control those bodily organs responsible for the production of speech sounds
    Monitoring one’s speech
    From time to time, we spontaneously interrupt our speech and correct ourselves. These corrections are referred to as self-repairs. They have a characteristic structure that consists of three parts. First we interrupt ourselves after we have detected an error in our speech. Second, we usually utter one of various editing expressions, including such terms as uh, sorry, I mean, and so forth. Finally we repair the utterance.
    Corrections may occur within a word:
    We can go straight on to the ye-, -- to the orange node.
    They may also occur immediately after an error:
    Straight on to green, -- to red.
    They may be delayed by one or more words:
    And from green left to pink – er from blue left to pink.
    Although the major function of the editing expressions is to indicate that a correction follows, these editing expressions may have different connotations:
    Bill hit him – hit Sam, that is. (to further specify a potentially ambiguous referent)
    I am trying to lease, or rather, sublease, my apartment. (to substitute a word that is similar in meaning to the original word, but slightly closer to the speaker’s meaning)
    I really like to – I mean, hate to – get up in the morning. (for true errors)
    Three types of repairs have been identified:
    Again left to the same blank crossing point – white crossing point. (instant repair)
    And left to the purple crossing point – to the red crossing point. (anticipatory retracing)
    From yellow down to brown – no – that’s red. (fresh start)
    回复

    使用道具 举报

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册 人人连接登陆

    本版积分规则   

    关闭

    您还剩5次免费下载资料的机会哦~

    扫描二维码下载资料

    使用手机端考研帮,进入扫一扫
    在“我”中打开扫一扫,
    扫描二维码下载资料

    关于我们|商务合作|小黑屋|手机版|联系我们|服务条款|隐私保护|帮学堂| 网站地图|院校地图|漏洞提交|考研帮

    GMT+8, 2024-4-20 11:25 , Processed in 0.057385 second(s), Total 9, Slave 9(Usage:7.75M, Links:[2]1,1_1) queries , Memcache On.

    Powered by Discuz!

    © 2001-2017 考研 Inc.

    快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表
    × 关闭