|
First two hours, now three hours-this is how far in advanceauthorities are recommending people show up to catch a domestic flight, atleast at some major U.S. airports with increasingly massive security lines. Americans are willing to tolerate time-consuming securityprocedures in return for increased safety. The crash of Egypt Air Flight804, whichterrorists may have downed over the Mediterranean Sea, provides another tragicreminder of why. But demanding too much of air travelers or providing toolittle security in return undermines public support for the process. And itshould: Wasted time is a drag on Americans' economic and private lives, not tomention infuriating. Last year, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA)found in a secret check that undercover investigators were able to sneakweapons---both fake and real-past airport security nearly every time they tried. Enhanced security measures since then,combined with a rise in airline travel due to the improving Chicago's O'HareInternational. It is not yet clearhow much more effective airline security has become-but the lines are obvious. Part of the issue is that the government did not anticipate thesteep increase in airline travel, so the TSA is now rushing to get newscreeners on the line. Part of the issue is that airports have only so muchroom for screening lanes. Another factor may be that more people are trying tooverpack their carry-on bags to avoid checked-baggage fees, though the airlinesstrongly dispute this. There is one step the TSA could take that would not requireremodeling airports or rushing to hire: Enroll more people in the PreCheckprogram. PreCheck is supposed to be a win-win for travelers and the TSA.Passengers who pass a background check are eligible to use expedited screeninglanes. This allows the TSA wants to enroll 25 million people in PreCheck. It has not gotten anywhere close to that, and one big reason issticker shock. Passengers must pay $85 every five years to process theirbackground checks. Since the beginning, this price tag has been PreCheck'sfatal flaw. Upcoming reforms might bring the price to a more reasonable level.But Congress should look into doing so directly, by helping to finance PreCheckenrollment or to cut costs in other ways. The TSA cannot continue diverting resources into underusedPreCheck lanes while most of the traveling public suffers in unnecessary lines.It is long past time to make the program work. 阅读如果在左手边做一个行数的话会很方便读者,但打出来可能会因为文字处理的数量不同而变得乱七八糟,只好用‘小段’‘句’来处理,如果真的看不懂可以问问题,我会很乐意回答。 举例:这篇文章共7小段。第1小段第1句是“First two…”;第7小段第1句是“The TSA cannot…”。 其实我很喜欢阅读题,比较好分析,分数又高,错过了可惜。文章不用全部读完,单字也不用全部知道,能感受到作者的走向就可以得高分,又有点像侦探破谜题。 我们开始吧。 21. the crash of Egypt AirFlight 804 is mentioned to [A] stress the urgency to strengthen security worldwide. [B] highlight the necessity of upgrading major US airports. [C] explain Americans' tolerance of current security checks. [D] emphasis the importance of privacy protection. 这种题目是大海捞针形,只要找到Egypt Air Flight804,然后看它前后句就能知道答案。对应到第2小段第2句。那么,804班机provides another reason of why。 another是另一个的意思,表示这是第二个理由了,那我们到前一句去找:美国人愿意乖乖等机场安检因为能保障他们飞行安全。in return for/of是交换,不管有形无形;time in return for flight safety:时间和安全都是无形的。 为了安全只好忍了,要不然Flight804被劫机然后空难的下场在他们乘坐的班机重现就惨了。忍:tolerate(动词);忍耐力,tolerance(名词),所以c)是正确答案。a)stress可以是压力的意思,可是这里是强调的意思。 22. Which of the followingcontributions to long waits at major airport? [A] New restrictions on carry-on bags. [B] The declining efficiency of the TSA. [C] An increase in the number of travelers. [D] Frequent unexpected secret checks. 也是大海捞针题,但我们虽然没有头绪也不要无头无脑,既然问题都在问long waits,花长时间等待,这种解释的段落不可能在第1小段:opening paragraph;然后第2小段上一题基本看完了,是在说忍受安检的理由,自然不在这里。我们从第3小段开始找,最后一句“-but the lines are obvious.”。long waits就是在排队等待,排‘队’美式英文是line,英式英文是queue;‘排队’或‘排好队’是get in line/queue;‘插队’是cut the line/queue。第3小段最后一句说“不过,后果就是大牌长龙。”,我们知道下一段,第4小段,就是这题的答案所在。第1句…steep increase in airline travel;steep是很陡,坡度增加很快,steep increase是暴增。什么暴增了,不是旅行的travelers就是货物。选项中只有c)符合。至于a)carry-onbags的确在第4小段中有提到:“Another factor…overpack carry-onbags…”,carry-on是随身小包/背包,但并没有对它设定restrictions,而是travelers怕托运行李过重被罚钱而把里面的东西塞到,over-pack,随身小包里;所以a)是错的。 23.The word"expedited" (Line 4, Para.5) is closest in meaning to [A] faster. [B] quieter. [C] wider. [D] cheaper. 找同义词。第5小段:‘Thereis one step the TSA…’第2句有个关键词:win-win;win说了两遍所以是双赢。旅客不用排队,机场不用担心有人炸飞机;双赢!结果就是一个有条件的‘expedited’ screening lanes,身份背景符合的旅客能排这个队;这样非isis怀疑对象的旅客能由这条队伍快速通过安检,而isis怀疑对象能排人数相对减少的原来安检队伍通关。每个人都同等安全的情况下比较快能进候机区,faster!答案只有a)。 24. One problem with thePreCheck program is [A] A dramatic reduction of its scale. [B] Its wrongly-directed implementation. [C] The government's reluctance to back it. [D] An unreasonable price for enrollment. 呈上一题第5小段介绍了PreCheckprogram是什么,也说明了好处,聪明的你猜第6小段要说什么?不是继续说它的好处就是说它的坏处,it’s problem。第5小段第1句结尾,sticker shock,如果知道是什么就可以直接选出答案,不知道的话我们找下一个提示,第3句‘…thisprice tag has been PreCheck’s fatal flaw.’,fatal是致命的,flaw是瑕疵,fatal flaw是要命的弱点;是一个problem吧?而跟主词price tag相关的就是d)unreasonable price,天价。Stickershock是当你在某名牌实体店看到喜欢物件,摆弄的爱不释手的时候,突然手贱拿起它的price tag,标价牌,然后抽了一口凉气的恐慌状态,shock。 25. Which of the followingwould be the best title for the text? [A] Less Screening for More Safety [B] PreCheck-a Belated Solution [C] Getting Stuck in Security Lines [D] Underused PreCheck Lanes Best title就是要帮作者些个标题你会怎么写。能自问作者为什么要写这一小段,这样自然能找出作者的意图。第1小段:美国大机场的常见现象,第2小段:为什么会发生-旅客角度,第3小段:为什么会发生-机场安检角度,第4段:作者分析原因,第5小段:作者的解决方案-PreCheck program,第6小段:作者解决方案的问题,第7小段:作者的呼吁。a)作者在第2小段反驳掉了:美国人愿意用时间换取安全,b)在第7小段可见作者要机场安检重视precheck program,c)假如没有第5,6,7小段,这的确是答案,d)在第7小段确实出现过,但如果作者用这为标题,必须列举更多precheck program不好的理由和例子。所以,答案是b),be-late是迟到,缓缓而来;想成 Don’t BE LATE for your test,考试日不要睡过头哦! 希望对准备考试的你有帮助。
|